Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 8#DFSMS
=[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 8|May 8]]=
==Chinese word "weiji"==
==Template:RD1==
==Athletics(sport)==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was delete
- {{no redirect|1 = Athletics(sport) }} → :Athletics (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Athletics(sport)&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2018-04-08&end=2018-05-07&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Athletics%28sport%29 stats])
[ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Athletics(sport)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Athletics(sport) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Athletics(sport)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Athletics(sport) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Athletics(sport)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Athletics(sport) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ]
I would have used "R3: Redirects as a result of an implausible typo or misnomers that were recently created" but its not recently created. We already have Athletics (sport), and the "implausible typo" is really ugly in the search box. Christian75 (talk) 17:44, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - I can see somebody typing this in, but I would think that he or she would immediately correct things. It doesn't appear really useful. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 20:11, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete – implausible. Note that I have also made a bot request which should end up with Athletics (sport) being a redirect to disambiguation anyway SFB 21:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment – I tidy up a lot after other editors and some have no concept of spaces whatsoever; they put them where they don't belong or they simply omit them where they do belong. Hence, I don't think it's an unlikely typo. Case in point can be found in this conversation. Schwede66 00:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No such usage without the space. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.