Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 5#CPU (heart…
=[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 5|April 5]]=
==Youtoob==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was keep
- {{no redirect|1 = Youtoob }} → :YouTube (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Youtoob&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-03-06&end=2019-04-04&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Youtoob stats])
[ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Youtoob|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Youtoob closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Youtoob|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Youtoob closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Youtoob|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Youtoob closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ]
Implausible redirect. CycloneYoris talk! 21:41, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
CommentKeep There is an entry for it in Urban Dictionary - [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=youtoob] (added 2008), therefore probably not implausible. Hzh (talk) 10:50, 6 April 2019 (UTC) Changed to keep after consideration as the rationale for deletion is incorrect. Hzh (talk) 12:38, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
:*{{Reply to|Hzh}} Urban Dictionary has a ton of entries, most of them are not even listed here on Wikipedia. CycloneYoris talk! 07:23, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
::: It's not about whether it's listed in Urban Dictionary or not, but whether it is a implausible search item (therefore implausible redirect) or not. It appears to be something that has been used before (its entry in Urban Dictionary is an indication of that), therefore it cannot be implausible. Hzh (talk) 09:24, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
::::*{{Reply to|Hzh}} You're the one that brought up the fact that it's listed in Urban Dictionary. By the way, since when is Urban Dictionary a reliable source? User-generated sites are not considered reliable sources in my opinion, and per Wikipedia also, see: WP:UGC. CycloneYoris talk! 00:52, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
:::::: You are missing the point entirely. Your rationale is that it is an implausible redirect, the fact that such a word has been used before indicates that it is not implausible. Whether it is given in Urban Dictionary or elsewhere is irrelevant, as is whether they are reliable sources or not. Just a little search and you'd see it used elsewhere - [https://books.google.com/books?id=sKruCAAAQBAJ&pg=PT133&dq=%22youtoob%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjPldmWp7_hAhW0RBUIHSB6CsMQ6AEILDAA#v=onepage&q=%22youtoob%22&f=false], and apparently used in South Park - [https://southpark.fandom.com/wiki/YouToob]. The word is mentioned in these articles - Canada on Strike and What What (In the Butt), therefore you can wikilink the word there it becomes straight away a valid redirect. Hzh (talk) 01:17, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Weak keep as phonetically plausible in some varieties of English. – Uanfala (talk) 22:19, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
