Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 5#Quote whore

• {{no redirect|1 = Wikipedia:Votes for keep }} → :Wikipedia:Deletion process  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_keep&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2018-12-06&end=2019-01-04&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Wikipedia%3AVotes_for_keep stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Votes for keep|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikipedia:Votes for keep closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Votes for keep|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikipedia:Votes for keep closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Votes for keep|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikipedia:Votes for keep closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Useless and implausible redirect. I don't understand how this redirect is useful in any way. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep seems like a very useful link for people who aren't familiar with the way deletion processes work on Wikipedia - someone looking at an AfD will see lots of what looks like votes for keeping the article. Thryduulf (talk) 22:46, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
• {{re|Thryduulf}} I disagree. They both don't link together. In the last year there are [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2018-01&end=2018-12&pages=Wikipedia:Votes_for_keep two views] for this redirect so it is not helpful in any way. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:49, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete as appears implausible, especially with such low page views. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 00:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. It might be old and venerable, but judging by its history, it was created in error: I don't think anyone would intentionally create a redirect with an ungrammatical title that makes it implausible as a search term (even in the context of the older days when AfD was called "Votes for Deletion"). – Uanfala (talk) 11:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. No incoming links, and a rather confusing title. I mean technically, anything not up for deletion is figuratively being voted for keep by the community. Steel1943 (talk) 04:30, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Quote whore }} → :Film criticism#"Quote whoring"  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quote_whore&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2018-12-06&end=2019-01-04&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Quote_whore stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Quote whore|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Quote whore closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Quote whore|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Quote whore closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Quote whore|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Quote whore closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 
• {{no redirect|1 = Quote Whore }} → :Film criticism  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quote_Whore&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2018-12-13&end=2019-01-11&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Quote_Whore stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Quote Whore|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Quote Whore closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Quote Whore|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Quote Whore closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Quote Whore|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Quote Whore closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Delete Targeted section has been removed, and the term no longer appears in the targeted article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:31, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:06, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 00:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Slogan 'AIDS Kills Fags Dead' }} → :Anti-LGBT rhetoric  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Slogan_%27AIDS_Kills_Fags_Dead%27&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2018-12-06&end=2019-01-04&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Slogan_%27AIDS_Kills_Fags_Dead%27 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Slogan 'AIDS Kills Fags Dead'|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Slogan 'AIDS Kills Fags Dead' closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Slogan 'AIDS Kills Fags Dead'|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Slogan 'AIDS Kills Fags Dead' closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Slogan 'AIDS Kills Fags Dead'|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Slogan 'AIDS Kills Fags Dead' closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

• {{no redirect|1 = Slogan:A woman's right to choose }} → :Abortion debate  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Slogan:A_woman%27s_right_to_choose&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2018-12-06&end=2019-01-04&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Slogan%3AA_woman%27s_right_to_choose stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Slogan:A woman's right to choose|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Slogan:A woman's right to choose closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Slogan:A woman's right to choose|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Slogan:A woman's right to choose closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Slogan:A woman's right to choose|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Slogan:A woman's right to choose closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Delete because the preceding "Slogan" and each one's punctuation makes both of these unlikely search terms. Nominating one with the colon and one without the colon but with quotation marks; assuming delete consensus develops I will nominate the other 30 or so redirects that follow one or the other forms. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete as to both. We don't have a "Slogan" namespace. Note that the versions of the slogans without the word "Slogan" and the unnecessary punctuation will continue to point to their respective targets. bd2412 T 20:19, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete as implausible. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 00:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per above. buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 21:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete both as above as they aren't ever referred to with Slogan as the lead word. Perhaps if the slogan was added to the end, but usually the phrase itself would have a match before needing to add slogan. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Big Cottonwvood Canyon Road }} → :Utah State Route 190  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Big_Cottonwvood_Canyon_Road&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2018-12-06&end=2019-01-04&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Big_Cottonwvood_Canyon_Road stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Big Cottonwvood Canyon Road|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Big Cottonwvood Canyon Road closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Big Cottonwvood Canyon Road|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Big Cottonwvood Canyon Road closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Big Cottonwvood Canyon Road|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Big Cottonwvood Canyon Road closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

If this had been caught 8 years ago it would have been an obvious WP:R3. The v in Cottonwvood makes this an implausible redirect. It would be plausible if it wasn't there. ~ GB fan 12:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 17:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Note also that a correctly-spelled redirect already exists. LJ ↗ 17:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = The Joy Bejar Show }} → :Joy Behar: Say Anything!  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Joy_Bejar_Show&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2018-12-06&end=2019-01-04&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=The_Joy_Bejar_Show stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:The Joy Bejar Show|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#The Joy Bejar Show closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:The Joy Bejar Show|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#The Joy Bejar Show closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:The Joy Bejar Show|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#The Joy Bejar Show closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Implausible misspelling of Joy Behar's last name. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 17:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.