Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 November 25#BRFA
=[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 November 25|November 25]]=
==Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Cube (Umpteenth nomination)==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was delete.
- {{no redirect|1 = Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Cube (Umpteenth nomination) }} → :Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Cube (4th nomination) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Time_Cube_(Umpteenth_nomination)&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-10-26&end=2019-11-24&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FTime_Cube_%28Umpteenth_nomination%29 stats])
[ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Cube (Umpteenth nomination)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Cube (Umpteenth nomination) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Cube (Umpteenth nomination)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Cube (Umpteenth nomination) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Cube (Umpteenth nomination)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Cube (Umpteenth nomination) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ]
The "Umpteenth" number is nonsense, and blogs down the results of Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Cube that generate on some of the AfD nominations of Time Cube. Also, this redirect has no incoming links. Steel1943 (talk) 23:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete due to WP:POINT. signed, Rosguill talk 23:28, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete while there were seven nominations (a decent number) I don’t see a valid reason for such a redirect. It’s not even a record since at the very least List of films that most frequently use the word "fuck" had more at 10.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 05:28, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- ...Looking for a record? Try this. Steel1943 (talk) 05:33, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. It looks like this was created as a joke. I can't envision any serious uses, and as Steel1943 and 69.157 mention, it isn't a record, or even any special case deserving such an unusual redirect. ComplexRational (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.