Login
Login

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 17#Lunchtime O'Booze

{{rfd log header|2025|April 16|2025|April 18}}

=[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 17|April 17]]=

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 17, 2025.

==Flabbiness==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 24%23Flabbiness

==Dante from the Devil May Cry series==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. Rusalkii (talk) 22:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

okay, let's try this again, with the caveat that it's still a relatively weak nom. i nominated it before like a month ago (see here), but it seems the question was entirely misread, so i'll try being a little more blunt. this might seem like a weird way to word the title, but not really inaccurate or anything. however, this specific wording refers to the "featuring dante from the devil may cry™ series" meme mentioned in #other games, which i recklessly boldly created "featuring dante from the devil may cry series" as a redirect to following that discussion, so... opinions on refining to that? consarn (featuring knuckles from the knuckles may chuckle™ series) 20:49, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep per me in the previous discussion, and throw a WP:TROUT at the nominator for potential WP:BLUDGEON concerns with this nomination ... especially since the previous RfD, Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 14#Dante from the Devil May Cry series, which was closed only about a month ago, was closed as "keep". Steel1943 (talk) 21:33, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep. If the goal is deletion, then nothing has changed since the last discussion. If the goal is refining, then I'm opposed to that because an obscure meme that might be the reason some people are using this search term doesn't justify not taking people to the content about the plain English meaning of the search term, especially if those who are looking for the specific information can easily navigate to it. Thryduulf (talk) 22:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
  • :if it needs saying, the goal isn't deletion, but it's good to know that there is opposition to refining consarn (prison phone) (crime record) 21:54, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep & Knuckles, unambiguous. Yes, it is a meme, but at the same time, how many causal everyday readers know of said meme? mwwv converse∫edits 13:46, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
  • :if search results are anything to go off of... pretty much everyone who searches for this specific wording. just on images, it took me a good few seconds holding page down to find one result that had nothing to do with the meme, and even then, it was only there because someone made that joke on a "& knuckles" post. reliable results that aren't about the meme are also only there because they contain links to reliable results that are, and so on and so forth for whatever else you want to apply that to. it's still extremely unimportant, but i find it unlikely that anyone looking for that would expect or have been introduced to this "oddly reoccurring" string of words by anything but the meme consarn (prison phone) (crime record) 21:53, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

:hmmst'd... i'm pretty sure this could be closed as featuring withdrawal from the nom may withdrawn series, if there is actual opposition to refining. then again, this is probably an inconsequential time to mention it if it's almost time to close it normally consarn (prison phone) (crime record) 23:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Battle Cry: Worship from the Frontlines==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 26%23Battle Cry: Worship from the Frontlines

==Center for Creative Media==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Jay 💬 13:59, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Not mentioned in the target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target article unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 20:20, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete or retarget. I can find no mention of this anywhere on Wikipedia. There are multiple mentions of the University of Hawaii's Academy for Creative Media, but that doesn't have an article so whether that would make a good target is moot. Run Run Shaw Creative Media Centre is the closest title match I've found but I'm undecided whether that would make a good search term - if it was just Creative Media Centre (or Center) it definitely would, but it isn't one of the many different institutions/organisations that google gives me on the first two pages of results for {{kbd|Center for Creative Media}}. Thryduulf (talk) 22:28, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:Delete Digging DEEP into the edit notes of this article's history, it looked like CCM was something originally at TMM but is no longer existing A) in this current moment in time or B) in TMM User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 11:43, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete. I don't think Run Run Shaw Creative Media Centre, a partial title match of a rephrase of this redirect, makes sense as a target, and an old TMM institution no longer either in the page or at TMM doesn't make sense either. Rusalkii (talk) 23:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==East Texas Adventure Course==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was soft delete

. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:East Texas Adventure Course}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 17#East Texas Adventure Course}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:East Texas Adventure Course}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the redirect's undeletion]. No one seems to want to go to bat for the twenty-year-old history even to the extent of suggesting an AfD and it certainly isn't merged anywhere. Rusalkii (talk) 17:57, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Not mentioned in the target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target article unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 20:20, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Comment this was created as an article in 2005. The last pre-BLAR revision makes the connection clear but if created that way today might be speedily deleted under G11 as exclusively promotional, although that criterion didn't exist then (I say might as it's right on the borderline imo, some admins would delete some would decline, either decision would likely be upheld at DRV). Thryduulf (talk) 22:51, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Xena: Warrior Princess (album, Volume NUMBER)==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 3%23Xena: Warrior Princess (album, Volume NUMBER)

==Water (album, ARTIST NAME)==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 1%23Water (album, ARTIST NAME)

==Jessu==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Rusalkii (talk) 22:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Not mentioned at target. Could also be a misnomer for Jessus Zambrano (note the extra "s" in the first name) or a misspelling of Jesus or even a partial title match of the movie title Jessu Jordaar. Duckmather (talk) 16:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==PHSC==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 27%23PHSC

==Chrust==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 24%23Chrust

==WindowsXI==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G4.

It's rare that G4 applies to a redirect with a different title, but given the trivial difference to the recently deleted redirect to the same target, created by the same editor, it does apply here. Thryduulf (talk) 10:20, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = WindowsXI }} → :Windows 11  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:WindowsXI|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#WindowsXI closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:WindowsXI|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#WindowsXI closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:WindowsXI|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#WindowsXI closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 8#Windows xi and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 12#Windows XI. Srleffler (talk) 05:59, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:This redirect was created during the former RfD. Does this qualify for a WP:G4 speedy? Note that the creator of this page has repeatedly recreated Windows XI despite the RfD that removed it. --Srleffler (talk) 06:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Lunchtime O'Booze==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was withdrawn

by the nominator. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 14:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Not mentioned at target; passing mention exists at George Gale (journalist) but that is about all content we have on this. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:34, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Trebles all round==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. Rusalkii (talk) 02:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

No mention at target; mentions in other articles all seem to be citations. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:32, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep It was previously mentioned there, but was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Recurring_jokes_in_Private_Eye&diff=prev&oldid=910781807 removed in this edit] by {{u|JzG}} because it was unsourced (so trebles all round for those stopping Wikipedia being a list of everything anyone can think of) I've added some sources (including a magazine citing "Trebles all round" for Private Eye itself) and put it back. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 06:29, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
  • :Thank you! Yes, it's still a recurring theme.
  • :Jeff bin in? Guy (help! - typo?) 08:30, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep now there is a mention, per Ritchie. Thryduulf (talk) 10:27, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Leslie Church==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 24%23Leslie Church

==Marginalized==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was speedy keep

. The proposed target is not an article (and is actually a redirect that points to the same target). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:54, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

wouldnt it be more understandable if retargeted to Marginalization? GustaPapp (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:Said page is a redirect to the same target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:33, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Comment I've categorised this as a {{temp|R avoided double redirect}} of Marginalization. This is explicitly without prejudice to any further discussion here. Thryduulf (talk) 10:30, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep Nominator's rationale is moot per above comments. I don't see a better target either. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).