Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2012 January 3#Latin characters in Unicode

For the last few years, I've enjoyed keeping up with Wikipedia-related blogs at [http://open.wikiblogplanet.com/ Open Wiki Blog Planet]. I view it daily in my browser. However, for the last six months or so, the site has very irregularly updated - perhaps about once a month. I don't think this is a caching issue on my end. Does anyone know what the problem is with the site, or suggest any change I can try on my end? What alternative compendiums of WP blogs are there? I am already aware of [http://en.planet.wikimedia.org/ Planet Wikimedia].-gadfium 00:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I have an Imac and I use the latest version of Firefox with pop-up blocker on but it only works sometimes. Some pop-ups continue to... pop up and especially ones from one site. Is there a way to target popups if you know a part of the URL? Alternatively, is there a Firefox add-on or other program that will be more effective? In the scheme of things, it's a minor annoyance, but enough of one that I'm asking.--108.46.103.88 (talk) 01:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

:I'd say AdBlock Plus is what you're looking for. -- 88.67.154.4 (talk) 09:41, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

:[http://www.admuncher.com/ AdMuncher] (not free) is pretty good, too. I use both at the same time. KägeTorä - (影虎) (TALK) 17:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I just added a single line referencing one of our articles to Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Computing#Pop_up_blocker_for_specific_site.3F and upon saving, I'm getting a captcha because I'm introducing external links?! Huh?! -- 88.67.154.4 (talk) 09:45, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

: Well, anti spam I would imagine. To make sure you're not a robot posting spam or advertising material from an external source? Mrlittleirish 10:23, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

:: Please, kindly explain what part of my edit was an external link? -- 88.67.154.4 (talk) 10:24, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

::: Good point, I read the question and not the link sorry! Note sure then... Mrlittleirish 10:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

::::Someone else inserted the external link, but you received the warning. This is a known bug. Von Restorff (talk) 10:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

:::::But there's no external link at all?! -- 88.67.154.4 (talk) 13:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

:::::And if you create yourself an account to edit from you shouldn't be bothered by these sort of annoyances. It's easy and free. --jjron (talk) 12:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

::::::Our name is Legion, for we are IP. Resistance is futile. You will be anonymized. -- 88.67.154.4 (talk) 13:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

:::::::Actually you are not a part of Anonymous. Usernames, when chosen correctly, can be more anonymous than IP's. Von Restorff (talk) 13:14, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

::::::::So are...-- 78.43.93.174 (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

:::::::::...sufficiently random IPs. --89.204.155.106 (talk) 17:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

::::::::::Don't you think? ;-) -- 91.47.17.11 (talk) 17:31, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

:::::::::::When you provide three IPs that trace to destinations near one another, it actually makes it easier to triangulate your location. A username has no geolocation unless one is given. Even then, the one given can be completely false. -- kainaw™ 21:08, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

::::::::::::

::::::::::::Kainaw is right. We know your approximate age, we know your sex, and we can geolocate you to a specific area. Your IP's are not "random" enough to hide your identity; the more info you give me the easier it is to find you. If the IPs would geolocate to places all over the world it would be even easier; certain countries do not respect the rights of their citizens and it would be quite easy to trace you even without computer skills by using social engineering and a bit of bribery. If you want to be anonymous on the internet there is 1 good trick: avoid using it. Von Restorff (talk) 01:30, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

:::::::::::::Um, no. First of all, I didn't want to run afoul of WP:POINT, so I stopped after four IPs. One of them belongs to a pool of IPs used nationwide for mobile devices (UMTS), geolocation info for that one can't be more specific than "Germany". This is basically a huge NAT array (used due the IP v4 shortage, and most users not needing a public IP on their mobile device).

:::::::::::::Also, some of the IPs don't "belong" to me, either (though I have permission from their owners to use them) and are not even in the same city, and I could have picked a US or UK IP as well to confuse you, or used Tor. While tracking me may seem easy to you, think about this: Without me admitting the use of all these IPs above, you would have had no proof of them being the same user, only a suspicion, e.g. see the mention of "fist" in Morse code (especially if I had used them to edit elsewhere, not in this thread). Plus, they're all dynamic IPs.

:::::::::::::With a username, once it has been de-anonymized, your complete edit history becomes known, in a way that it can be proven, not just guessed/assumed. Which is not something you want w/r/t previous/future employers, law enforcement (esp. in the kind of countries you mentioned above), or even your neighbo(u)rs... -- 88.67.154.4 (talk) 09:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC) PS: Von Restorff, you're younger than me, but let's keep WP:OUTING in mind and stop here. ;-)

::::::::::::::Um, no. For law enforcement it is quite easy to geolocate mobile devices. It is possible to change usernames (almost) as quickly as IP's; so there is not much difference in that aspect. Making an account also takes less than a minute. But IP's are geolocatable and some usernames are not. The MediaWiki software's TorBlock extension automatically blocks all editing through Tor. Von Restorff (talk) 09:41, 4 January 2012 (UTC) p.s. In which month was I born? {{smiley|3}}

:Well essentially, you are just trolling now. If you wanted to hide, like someone said before, don't use the internet. There is always a way to track IP's. It's not that hard for me or you to really. If you want to carry on changing IP's or using someone else's IP, then you carry on. It's no skin off anybodies nose here. Mrlittleirish 10:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

::@Mr X.: if you want to we can continue this discussion on my talkpage, that is probably a better place.

::@Mr little irish: I know your intentions are good but relax mate, he is not trolling, he just believes some misconceptions about anonymity on the internet. Von Restorff (talk) 10:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

::I'm not trolling, we're just drifting off-topic from my original question (hence the ). As per Von Restorff's suggestion, we're moving it to his talk page. -- 88.67.154.4 (talk) 14:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

I have Extreme GPU Bruteforcer and with 3000 PasswordsInThread and 512 streamprocessors and both min and max length 8 chars I get about 300.00M p/s. How can I improve this without spending money?

My firefox (v9) has developed an annoying habit (since around v4). It works fine for about 8 seconds, then seems to freeze for 3 seconds. The content of the page doesn't seem to matter, as while I type this, it is freezing on and off (resulting in half a sentence suddenly appearing). I can be scrolling up or down the reference desks, and it will freeze, then suddenly jump to wherever it was I would have been. It's very annoying and for this reason I prefer to use Opera, however, firefox does have some features I like to use once in a while. I believe it might have something to do with constantly checking for updates to addons. Is it possible to get firefox to just check for these addons once a day? I mean, if there was no update 5 seconds ago, I doubt there'd be one now. It only happens with Firefox and nothing else. KägeTorä - (影虎) (TALK) 17:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Your article on mercury states the following:

I have 30 fields named diag1, diag2, diag3, diag4... I want to get a list of rows in which any of those fields have the value '410'. I know this will not work: select * from er where 'diag%'='410'. Is there a way to fuzzy-select all the fields at once? -- kainaw™ 18:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

What fonts support Latin Extended-C and Latin Extended-D and is there anywhere I can download them? --Theurgist (talk) 22:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello. How do software developers keep track of the number of PCs on which a program with a specific serial key is installed, especially if your PC crashes and you have to re-install the program? If a license on your PC is 1-user and your PC crashes, how does the software company know that you are not installing the program on a second PC? Thanks in advance. --Mayfare (talk) 23:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC)