Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2015 February 3

So as it looks like, it's just a DB of viruses. What makes this company special enought to be bought by Google? Couldn't Google have developed this thing in-house? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.4.155.2 (talk) 00:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

:My guess is purchasing the virus and clean executable dataset for use in Google Chrome's download cloud antivirus (it has a pretty good one), as well as Google Safe Browsing. Talent may also be a factor, however my guess is their acquisition was mostly for the data. ☃ Unicodesnowman (talk) 08:50, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

: Certainly Google could have amassed this data themselves, but buying this company may well have been a cheaper and faster way to get there. They are also buying the income from whatever other businesses were purchasing this data from VirusTotal...and that may be a worthwhile reason. Sometimes businesses will buy other companies just to prevent their competitors from doing so.

: SteveBaker (talk) 16:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

What software is similar to MS FrontPage, where you don't need to use the HTML codes to create a webpage(s), but can view the page source code if wished? -- (Russell.mo (talk) 19:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC))

:You can look at List_of_HTML_editors. Ruslik_Zero 19:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

:It sounds like you're looking for an editor with a WYSIWYG interface. There is a list at Comparison of HTML editors which says which programs offer such an option. Dismas|^(talk) 19:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

::I don't have clue peeps. The lists you two gave, it came across like a cave language (lol). All I know i.e. I used MSfrontPage when I was young, I am in a Third World country, I can buy any kind of software I want here, a cousin of mine gave me Sublime Text 3 which looked like the page source coding section and advised not to buy Adobe Dreamweaver (what he mentioned as 'crap', and I have not found a better alternative of this). I have never ever made a webpage which went live, in my life. I did however, create an MS Webpage kind of thing when I was young, but it never went live... It was for fun. I'm new to the whole web designing thing... I want to buy a software that has the MSfrontPage qualities and the sublime Text 3 qualities, a software that is functional, has anything and everything desirable, that I can start learning. Whatever you guys recommend to learn, I will be using those softwares for at least about 20 years (including its upgrades). Any suggestions? -- (Russell.mo (talk) 08:32, 4 February 2015 (UTC))

::: I quite like KompoZer --TrogWoolley (talk) 14:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

::::I'll review it. Thank you {{=)}} -- (Russell.mo (talk) 21:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC))

:::::I've reviewed it {{U|TrogWoolley}}, not bad, a bit similar to what I need, the rating of the software itself seem to be bad though. -- (Russell.mo (talk) 18:52, 6 February 2015 (UTC))

Does anybody know how to create an account at the entitled website, from PC? I can't seem to find a way... -- (Russell.mo (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC))

:There doesn't seem to be a way to create an account through a computer. It seems that the only way to do it is through the app. That makes sense since the company is completely based on the apps. Dismas|^(talk) 19:52, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

::I understand. Thank you. -- (Russell.mo (talk) 08:04, 4 February 2015 (UTC))

I have the entitled Nokia phone; I kind of forgot the 'security lock code' which I personally modified before forgetting it. Does anybody know how I can unlock it without taking it to the shop? They are asking a fixing fee of 2,000. I have ordered a USB connection charger port, with the hope that I can fix it with that, but I need some help from you guys/girls to guide me the correct path/route in what software I should use to mitigate… -- (Russell.mo (talk) 19:43, 3 February 2015 (UTC))

:Isn't this situation what the PUC is used for? Also, a quick google points towards [https://tjosm.com/3148/reset-forgotten-nokia-security-code/ this online article], but I seem to recall older Nokia user manuals described in detail how to reset to factory condition. WegianWarrior (talk) 09:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

::PUC is for the SIM's PIN, not the screen saver lock PIN. I think Russell is asking for the latter. If it is the SIM PIN, phone your network operator for the PUC, then enter the SIM code incorrectly three times; the phone will ask for the PUC, and possibly a new SIM-code. LongHairedFop (talk) 12:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

:::It is a second hand phone, I didn't receive any manuals. I tried the 12345 so many times, words won't explain it. That's why I sought help from you guys. It is unlocked btw; the 12345 in the factory reset option done it... Thank you thank you thank you friends {{sert|happy}}. -- (Russell.mo (talk) 14:34, 4 February 2015 (UTC))

{{Resolved}}

What is the best way to be absolutely sure to get the latest version of a web page, bypassing any possible caches? I know I can just telnet to the web site and directly issue a HTTP GET command, but is even that guaranteed to always get the latest version? JIP | Talk 20:25, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

:The general solution to this problem is to use a cryptographically valid digital signature and/or to encrypt the data from its point of origin. If the data is not signed and/or encrypted, you cannot strongly assert that it hasn't been tampered with - and in this case, proxying and caching are a simple form of tampering. See, e.g., tamper-evident technology. Nimur (talk) 21:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

::I don't think that's correct. The signature protects the content of the message so you know it hasn't been tampered with, but caching doesn't change the content. --65.94.50.4 (talk) 22:27, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

:::The content can be timestamped. The signature then provides assurance that the (recently-timestamped) content is current. By itself, this is not sufficient to guarantee that the content is the most current - which would require bidirectional communication. The client would have to inform the host which version it has received, and the host would have to assert that version is correct; and the integrity of the bidirectional traffic needs to be assured (with a signature). Nimur (talk) 00:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

::::And the reply from the host would have to incorporate the query, so you'd know it wasn't itself coming from the cache. Yes, I think these additional requirements might suffice. --65.94.50.4 (talk) 23:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

: At a minimum, you need to set a cache-control HTTP header in the GET request. Without this, a proxy between the client and the real web server may server a cached version. This is the case for sites behind a CDN, and for sites which use their own caching proxy - e.g. Wikipedia, where anons are served pages from a Squid proxy and not (necessarily) the up-to-date version from an actual Apache server. -- Finlay McWalterᚠTalk 21:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

::Note that the proxy could also be a transparent proxy run by your ISP or similar, of which the web server (and possibly even you) have little or no control over. Nil Einne (talk) 14:00, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

: The wget program fetches web-pages, and most embedded content, it can also follow links to fetch linked pages, recursively. It has a cache-control option, and can send arbitrary HTTP requests to the server. LongHairedFop (talk) 12:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

:Assuming you are using Windows, Shift+F5 Justin15w (talk) 16:51, 6 February 2015 (UTC)