Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2015 December 27#placename element etymologies website
{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Special:Undelete| |{{#if:|
placename element etymologies website
Is there a website that deals with placename element etymologies of different regions and nations like in Bangladesh, you have places with -pur (e.g. Rangpur, Pirojpur, Sherpur), -hat (Lalmonirhat and Bagerhat), -ganj (e.g. Sirajganj), -na (e.g. Pabna and Khulna), -gram (e.g. Kurigram), -ail (e.g. Tangail and Narail), -khali (e.g. Noakhali and Patuakhali), -bazar (e.g. Moulvibazar), and -para (e.g. Tungipara and Ullahpara)? Donmust90 (talk) 00:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Donmust90Donmust90 (talk) 00:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
:United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names will point you to the closest resources that exist for a centralized global research effort on toponymy, though I don't think their present efforts are long on etymology. Similar databases exist for specific regions and languages which will vary widely in how much they devote to the evolution of particular toponyms and the morphemes they share in common. However, if you combine more general historical/comparative morpheme databases with the geographic databases, you'll often be be able to answer a good many questions which may be driving your search. Perhaps if you would like to tell us the purposes which you hope these etymologies might serve, we might be able to present a specific combination of research databases that would fit those needs. You also might contemplate moving this thread to the languages desk, as you may be more likely to get more eyes knowledgeable in this area there. Snow let's rap 05:43, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
The reason I asked this question is because I want to know what are these places mean and in English language what are their counterparts like is -pur is to -ton, is -hat is to -shire and such. Donmust90 (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Donmust90Donmust90 (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
:See :Category:Lists of placename etymologies.—Wavelength (talk) 23:43, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Map or table of total number of civilian firearms per state
I'm trying to find a map outlining the number of guns owned by civilian in each state. Alternatively a table of such data would also work since I can crate the map myself. Also alternatively a guns-owned-per-capita map/data would also suffice since I can just multiple it by the state population.
I found a couple of "gun ownership" maps by state[http://www.motherjones.com/files/gun-ownership-map-updated.png][http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BmJ0sd4XzTA/UBGlpDVugcI/AAAAAAAAACE/jE3NiGKEPZY/s1600/StateGuns.jpg][http://static3.businessinsider.com/image/559451a2ecad0464750b3d6c-1200-970/gun-ownership-study-state-map.png][https://qzprod.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/household-gun-ownership-rates-_mapbuilder-1.png?w=640], but they count "percentage of population who are gun owners", so it's a slightly different statistic.
I found this map[http://www.movoto.com/blog/opinions/gun-ownership-map/] and table pair but unfortunately they're not helpful since they assume that guns are equally distributed to each state.731Butai (talk) 09:52, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
:As shown in Gun laws in the United States by state, a number of states don't require registration. The question then becomes, how closely (if at all) the federal government tracks the manufacture and distribution of firearms. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 16:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
::Many of the countries listed in Number of guns per capita by country, including United States, don't have mandatory gun registration, and yet we have statistics on all of them. I never expected an official count, since there is none; an authoritative estimate is perfectly fine. 731Butai (talk) 03:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
:I see the value of the per capita distribution per state, but the absolute numbers seem meaningless, to me. That will mostly just reflect the population of each state. StuRat (talk) 03:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
::It's useful in cases like when a gun manufacturer is deciding where to locate their distribution center, which should ideally be closest to where most of their customers are. Looking at the per capita map would have you placing the distribution center between Wyoming, Montanna, and Idaoh, where gun ownership are the highest. But that's clearly wrong due to the low population of those states.
::I'm fine with either per capita or absolute numbers, since I can convert between them myself like I mentioned in the OP.731Butai (talk) 04:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
:::Then you'd want to know the density of gun sales per area. Still, you might do better to locate in a gun-friendly state, like the ones you mentioned, to avoid problems with the law and lawsuits. Guns are rather portable, and can be shipped for a tiny portion of their price, so there's no need to produce them where they are to be sold. StuRat (talk) 04:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
::::The Wikipedia reference desk: your go-to source on why your question is unanswerable or not worth answering. -Elmer Clark (talk) 20:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
:::::Note that the Geneva-based Small Arms Survey are considering the United States a state [https://books.google.com/books?id=Lmy9e_LGwdoC&pg=PA90&lpg=PA90&dq=Small+Arms+Survey+us+per+state&source=bl&ots=OrI0EevSAt&sig=-sZfBubQPWwdK-2qfjRfZXfdda0&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjz2-KDzYnKAhWG2hoKHY-zCmA4ChDoAQgpMAM#v=onepage&q=by%20no%20means&f=false], so they are not being helpful either. --Askedonty (talk) 22:11, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
:[http://www.bloomberg.com/visual-data/best-and-worst//most-registered-guns-per-capita-states This] seems to be answering the request - (I just wonder if the data is accurate?) --Askedonty (talk) 22:43, 1 January 2016 (UTC)