Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Language/2015 December 11#Link Grammar

{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Special:Undelete| |{{#if:|

}} {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Wikipedia|{{#switch:{{NAMESPACE}}|= |
}}|{{error:not substituted|Archive header}}
}}}} {{#if:|
}}
width = "100%"
colspan="3" align="center" | Language desk
width="20%" align="left" | < December 10

! width="25%" align="center"|<< Nov | December | Jan >>

! width="20%" align="right" |{{#ifexist:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Language/2015 December 12|December 12|Current desk}} >

align=center width=95% style="background: #FFFFFF; border: 1px solid #003EBA;" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0"
style="background: #5D7CBA; text-align: center; font-family:Arial; color:#FFFFFF;" | Welcome to the Wikipedia Language Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is {{#ifexist:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Language/2015 December 21|an archive page|a transcluded archive page}}. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

__TOC__

= December 11 =

Link Grammar

Is there a theoretical motivation for link grammar? Every description I've been able to find seems to imply it's a purely ad hoc algorithm, but it would seem reasonable for a theory to reflect linkages across words within sentence constituents and also reflect boundaries between constituents, and link grammar and syntactic merge both seem to do this. Peter Grey (talk) 23:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)