Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2012 August 21#Link to a result

{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Special:Undelete| |{{#if:|

}} {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Wikipedia|{{#switch:{{NAMESPACE}}|= |
}}|{{error:not substituted|Archive header}}
}}}} {{#if:|
}}
width = "100%"
colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk
width="20%" align="left" | < August 20

! width="25%" align="center"|<< Jul | August | Sep >>

! width="20%" align="right" |{{#ifexist:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2012 August 22|August 22|Current desk}} >

align=center width=95% style="background: #FFFFFF; border: 1px solid #003EBA;" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0"
style="background: #5D7CBA; text-align: center; font-family:Arial; color:#FFFFFF;" | Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is {{#ifexist:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2012 August 31|an archive page|a transcluded archive page}}. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

__TOC__

= August 21 =

Link to a result

I'm trying to find a proof online for a result from Hardy's book. Start with a fixed irrational number, say α, and consider the subset of the interval (0,1) given by {{nowrap|1=N → (0,1)}}, where n is sent to {{nowrap|1=nα mod 1}}. The result states that the image of this function is dense in (0,1). Fly by Night (talk) 17:48, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

:I don't have a link to a proof, but I can give you a proof. Let x be our fixed irrational. For any integer q, put a(q) for the largest b so b / q < x. Then a(q) / q < x < (1 + a(q)) / q and since multiples of a given rational r cycle through {0/r,...(r - 1)/r} mod 1, we have for any b and q a y in the image so b/q < y < (1 + b)/q. So, given any two rationals s < t, pick b and q so s < b / q < (b + 1) / q < t; then the image must be dense since it has a member between every two rationals in the interval. Sorry if you were looking for some specific proof; also sorry for still not using the math style (esp. since you are the one who pointed it out to me!) :-) Phoenixia1177 (talk) 03:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

:Incidentally, the answer to the previous question follows from this result (maybe that's why you brought it up?). Choosing the irrational number to be 1/2π, there are infinitely many integers n such that n/2π in an interval around 1/4 mod 1, so sin(n) will be near 1. Rckrone (talk) 03:47, 22 August 2012 (UTC)