Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests#Contested technical requests
= Technical requests =
== Uncontroversial technical requests ==
- {{RMassist/core | 1 = Amotomanco | 2 = Amotomanco language | discuss = | reason = standard title for recently created stub that had been a rd to the same location; should rd to the same article | sig = — kwami (talk) 21:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC) | requester = Kwamikagami}}
- {{RMassist/core | 1 = Yarrambat, Victoria | 2 = Yarrambat | discuss = | reason = Primary topic for this name, so the state name is not needed. | sig = – numbermaniac 17:39, 7 June 2025 (UTC) | requester = Numbermaniac}}
== Requests to revert undiscussed moves ==
== Contested technical requests ==
- {{RMassist/core | 1 = William Sloane (writer) | 2 = William Sloane | discuss = | reason = The only other article titled William Sloane is a disambiguation page that exclusively links to people with middle names or initials in their article titles (William Douglas Sloane, William Milligan Sloane, and William A. Sloane). | sig = Sipiso (talk) 16:51, 6 June 2025 (UTC) | requester = Sipiso}}
::William Sloane (writer) does not get the majority of the pageviews and is unlikely to be the primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 21:47, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- {{RMassist/core | 1 = Buttock augmentation | 2 = Gluteoplasty | discuss = | reason = The lead immediately names the procedure "Gluteoplasty" and I think it should fit the pattern set by Rhinoplasty and Vaginoplasty. I tried to move it myself, but it failed. | sig = Yyannako (talk) 20:39, 31 May 2025 (UTC) | requester = Yyannako}}
- Rather than just considering consistency with other articles, what is the WP:COMMONNAME? -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:25, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- On the other hand, WP:MEDTITLE should be considered. — BarrelProof (talk) 18:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- :Medtitle vs Commonname would be MOS vs policy, I'd be inclined to think MEDTITLE would win here, and I would personally support Gluteoplasty, however that's without evidence being presented. Given the impasse, a discussion might be a good idea (there's also possibly the argument that the common name is Gluteoplasty, but I'm unsure) ASUKITE 16:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
:: @Yyannako There is sufficient discussion here that shows that this move is not entirely uncontroversial so an RM should be performed. cyberdog958Talk 03:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- {{RMassist/core | 1 = Kanwaljit Singh (actor) | 2 = Kanwaljeet Singh | discuss = | reason = His name was spelled and credited as Kanwaljeet in all of his movies | sig = 116.206.202.59 (talk) 07:28, 5 June 2025 (UTC) | requester = 116.206.202.59}}
:: Recent move vandalism (and the reverts) indicate a possible controversy, I would suggest a discussion (you can click "discuss" above and fill in your rationale, then click submit/publish, or ask me and I can help) ASUKITE 18:21, 6 June 2025 (UTC)