Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Chris G

FINAL (0/2/0); withdrawn by candidate[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FChris_G&diff=142413780&oldid=142412427] July 4, 2007

{{User|Chris G}} - I have been editing wikipedia since 2006 a wihile back I went up for rfa and failed, but by now I think I have addressed all the concerns users had and I would like to try again. Chris ^g 06:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

:1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

::A: I would like to take part in AIV work as well as clearing up the backlogs(eg. WP:CSD).

:2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

::A: My best contributions would be to wikipedia's Linux articles becouse the changes are still visable today.

:3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

::A: I have receved a few personal attacks when reverting vandlsim but I kept a cool head and I think all of the users ended up getting indef blocks.

{{#ifeq:Chris G|Chris G||

• Links for Chris G: {{usercheck-short|Chris G}}

----

Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Chris G before commenting.

Support

Oppose

1. Just not enough experience. 24% of the edits are towards userspace, as well as not enough contributions to article expansion and improvement. The answers to the questions are also very short, and don't demonstrate a huge amount of knowledge of Wikipedia. --Dark Falls ^talk 07:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
2. Oppose -- Darkfall is exactly right. More experience needed. Anonymous Dissident^Talk 07:16, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

:The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.