Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pookeo9 2

Final (0/3/0); Closed per WP:NOTNOW by non-bureaucrat SoWhy '''at 22:11, 20 December 2008 (UTC).

{{User|Pookeo9}} – Pookeo9 (talk) 21:54, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

:Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept--Pookeo9 (talk) 21:59, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

The candidate may make an optional statement here.

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

:1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

::A: I intend to take part in the WikiProjects as most articles in them need major clean up and more information.

:2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

::A: My Best Contributions were to the Green Bay Packers WikiProject because I helped with the AJ Hawk Article and added information that was important and wasnt in there. Also, I helped with the AFD by putting at least 5 articles that werent important to Wikipedia and I will continue to look for articles that arent important and putting them on the AFD page.

:3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

::A: No, and I hope I never will.

• See Pookeo9's edit summary usage with [http://toolserver.org/~mathbot/cgi-bin/wp/rfa/edit_summary.cgi?user=Pookeo9&lang=en mathbot's tool]. For the edit count, see the talk page.

{{#ifeq:Pookeo9 2|Pookeo9||

• Links for Pookeo9: {{usercheck-short|Pookeo9}}

----

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Pookeo9 before commenting.

1. Oppose per WP:NOTNOW. User has not shown significant wiki-growth since January and is still under 500 edits overall, mostly to non-article space. I suggest that the user build up more on their article growth, vandalism fighting, and maybe in a couple years. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
2. WP:NOTNOW for me too, m'fraid. Sorry, you're on the right path, but I need more evidence to support the granting of tools. Garden. 22:05, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
3. Oppose Not now. Answers to questions leave much to be desired. Sam ^Blab 22:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

:The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.