Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Sentiments777

Final (0/2/0); ended 19:38, 1 August 2014 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW. SuperMarioMan ( talk ) 19:38, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

{{User|Sentiments777}} – Sentiments777 (talk) 19:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

:1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

::A: I would like to take part in the Articles for creation as well as Articles for deletion portion of the encyclopedia. I would like to give my 100% to it. I will be more available after 20th August, though.Sentiments777 (talk) 19:11, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

:2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

::A: There are some contributions, but I would like to contribute more and more on Wikipedia.Sentiments777 (talk) 19:11, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

:3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

::A: When any conflict arises, I follow the instructions carefully, and refer to the criteria. Usually I gain my knowledge through this. It may be time consuming but worth spending time. This way my contributions are less likely to face any conflict in future. Sentiments777 (talk) 19:11, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

• Links for Sentiments777: {{usercheck-short|Sentiments777}}
• Edit summary usage for Sentiments777 can be found [https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/editsummary/index.php?name=Sentiments777&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia here].

----

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

{{RfA/RfB Toolbox|Sentiments777}}

1. User has barely edited Wikipedia despite being registered since October 2012. There is nothing suggesting they would be suitable for administrator tools due to the lack of edits. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 19:19, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
2. Oppose This RFA was poorly conceived. With only six edits in the last two years the user is clearly ineligible. Antrocent (♫♬) 19:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

:The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.