Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Calsicol

class="messagebox"

| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}
to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Pending&action=edit§ion=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

=== Calsicol ===

{{checkuser|Calsicol}}

{{checkuser|Merchbow}}

Code letter: D

Calsicol messed up when he replied to a comment on Merchbow's talk page, and we see Merchbow amend his signature here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Merchbow&diff=next&oldid=86724616]. A number of double votes at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 November 4 have subsequently been stricken out. Both accounts have been around for some time (June 2005 for Calsicol and Jan 2006 for Merchbow) but both have a large amount of edits categorising articles. Neither has edited since the sock puppet tag was added their user pages based on the talk page diff. Tim! 19:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

{{Declined}} Sounds to me like this one is pretty clear, and barring some issue rising from the unspecified deletion discussions, I don't really see where a checkuser is necessary. If there are special circumstances that require checkuser, please cite them, but barring that, I don't see any reason to go to the trouble of checking a pretty obvious case. Essjay (Talk) 02:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.