Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Crown SEO

class="messagebox"

| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}
to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser&action=edit§ion=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

= [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Crown SEO|Crown SEO]] =

{{checkip|69.43.203.189}}
{{checkip|69.43.203.190}}
{{checkip|69.43.203.191}}
{{checkip|69.43.203.192}}
{{checkip|69.43.203.193}}

Code letter: G

Supporting evidence: Following up from Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Crown_SEO.2C_advertising_that_they_spam_Wikipedia. Crown SEO have openly admitted to intentionally spamming wikipedia or editing articles with a WP:COI. http://network-tools.com/ reveals the above addresses are used exclusivly by Crown SEO. Do any accounts use those IP's? User:Promethean (talk) 02:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

:No obvious evidence of abuse, given the IPs you've mentioned here. I suppose it's possible they might be using proxies or other addresses, but that's beyond the scope I'm currently looking at. For the time being, I'd say this is {{completed}} and would strongly recommend against any rangeblocking at this time. – Luna Santin (talk) 09:18, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

:: Very Well, Ill keep digging. User:Promethean (talk) 04:13, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.