Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ed Poor

• {{checkuser|Ed_Poor}}
• {{checkuser|LenW}}

Serious edit war at Intelligent design between User:Ed Poor and the remaining editors, resulting in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Intelligent_design&diff=56204033&oldid=56203956 full protection of the page], 3RR violation report filed against Ed Poor and RFC filed against Ed Poor. Just after this all had started, User:LenW reinserted the last statement of Ed Poor, which was not a simple revert an other edit had taklen place to correct grammar errors [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Intelligent_design&action=history]. Consequently, the suggestion of sockpuppetry has been brougt forward, and it might need to be established beyond doubt. Of course, this could be a coincidence and if this is insufficient for a checkuser, I understand. -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 23:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

{{unrelated}} I generally do not run checkusers on highly established users without strong evidence, but as I see potential for this to escalate, I went ahead and ran it. The two do not appear to be related at all (separate countries). Essjay (Talk • Connect) 19:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

:Thanks, this sets some issues aside that otherwise would be linguring, but I would have understand if it you had not done it. -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 00:51, 5 June 2006 (UTC)