Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ilecity

class="messagebox"

| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}
to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser&action=edit§ion=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

= [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ilecity|Ilecity]] =

{{checkuser|Ilecity}}

{{checkuser|MotionMan45}}
{{checkuser|Whordwind}}
{{checkip|99.243.219.77}}
{{checkip|70.82.224.27}}

Code letter: G
Supporting evidence: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jonathan_Emile&diff=202981925&oldid=202293514] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jonathan_Emile&diff=202278757&oldid=202277060] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jonathan_Emile&diff=202086452&oldid=201574259] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jonathan_Emile&diff=201380196&oldid=201308340]

Apparent !vote stacking on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Emile--the contributions from all accounts focus solely on the article and deletion discussion and have all been active from around March 28. While it's clear from their contributions that they are related, the use of two different IP addresses (one in Toronto, one in Montreal) led me to suspect that they might be meat rather than sock puppets, which would naturally affect how the extra accounts are handled. --jonny-m t 03:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

{{confirmed}}, also {{user|Whorldwind}}. Thatcher 13:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
All named accounts are blocked and tagged, apart from the IPs which appear to be dynamic so blocking could cause collateral. Rudget (review) 15:21, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.