Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Its Pytch.. Hon

{{rfcu box|case=Its Pytch.. Hon|filed=23:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)}}

• {{checkuser|Its Pytch.. Hon}}

• {{checkuser |Webb Traverse}}
  
• {{checkuser |Missmabry}}
  
• {{checkuser |Errol 2007}}
  
• {{checkip |66.50.235.167}}
  
• {{checkip |64.237.153.159}}
  
• {{checkuser |Lenny johnson}}
  
• {{checkuser |Mother of creation}}
  
• {{checkip |64.237.159.171}}
  
• {{checkuser |New Killer Star}}
  
• {{checkuser |Bad Buddha's Saint}}
  
• {{checkuser |Sean Ribot Jr.}}
  
• {{checkuser |Clinton Gore}}
  
• {{checkuser |Hot Rat 99}}
  
• {{checkuser |MEZCAM}}
  
• {{checkuser |Hoegaardenhard}}
  
• {{checkuser |Healotembleq}}
  
• {{checkuser |Satori the First}}
  
• {{checkuser |Evendeeper}}
  
• {{checkuser |Soap Bar II}}
  
• {{checkuser |The Final Warning}}
  
• {{checkuser |Lamerflame}}
  
• {{checkuser |Lad Nav Bandit}}
  
• {{checkuser |Macenroe}}
  
• {{checkuser |Scandinavia ... Word!}}
  
• {{checkuser |Lew Basnight IV}}
  
• {{checkuser |BLOWMEAN II}}
  
• Code letter: G
• Supporting evidence:

Admitted as such [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Rambling_Man&diff=prev&oldid=175897845 here]. Very similar editing patterns, edit summaries, and each one created virtually identical pages in different editor's userspace - here and here (which I've deleted since it was in my userspace). Both intent on recreating previously deleted material as witnessed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Undelete/Adrian_Voyd here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Undelete/Adrian_Boyd here]. The last one is worrying, potentially exposing a large number of accounts with similar editing styles... such as those now listed above...

User:Webb Traverse has now created this page which is remarkably similar to the two posted above...The Rambling Man (talk) 13:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

This was created by another of the socks, User:Lew Basnight IV. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

;Comments

I think you are on to something. Can you get this sock puppetry confirmed by a Checkuser, and then block all but the main account? The Checkuser may be able to identify additional accounts not listed here. I have not checked yet, but has this user has been warned not to recreate deleted, non-notable articles, and not to edit with multiple accounts for the purpose of disruption or evading scrutiny? If so, and he has continued to do so, I think a community ban would be appropriate. If he hasn't been properly warned yet, he needs to be told that a ban is the likely outcome if he persists in this disruptive behavior. - Jehochman ^Talk 15:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

: I understand that it may be a logistical challenge to notify all the accounts. If Checkuser shows them to be the same person, I think that if any one account has been notified previously, or now, that is fair. If the user has created a confusing situation for himself because he's operating so many accounts, in fairness, I think that's his problem, not ours. - Jehochman ^Talk 16:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

::Cool, good advice. I've told a number of the puppets that recreating the deleted material is inappropriate, but just to be sure I've added a final warning on (what I'm assuming is) the current puppeteer's page to desist. We'll see what Alison comes up with and take appropriate action. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

:::I've warned every registered user on the list with {{subst:socksuspectnotice|1=Its Pytch.. Hon}} ~~~~ - Jehochman ^Talk 17:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

::::Thanks for the support! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:40, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, this looks like a major headache. The last ten or so accounts are linked by Rafael Trelles, Plasda, and a veiled threat against The Rambling Man ("We believe..." in the edit summary). It's hard to know what's the story with the older editors from February 2007 and even earlier. I don't think there's much to gain from blocking accounts that are already inactive for more than six months. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 18:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

: Guys, as this has now moved into threats, etc, can you paste this over on WP:RFCU as a case and I'll see to it ASAP? Thanks - Alison ^❤ 22:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Hope that does it. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

:{{confirmed}} - {{User|Its Pytch.. Hon}} = {{User|BLOWMEAN II}} = {{User|The Final Warning}} = {{User|Scandinavia ... Word!}} = {{User|Webb Traverse}} = {{User|Blinded by Madness}} = {{User|Lew Basnight V}} = {{User|Lew Basnight IV}} = {{User|Healotembleq}} = {{User|Jay Corned}} = {{User|Macenroe}} {{User|THE MAC ZEN ROW}} = {{User|MEZCAM}} = {{User|Sads like happy}} = {{User|Best Wishes II}} = {{User|Best Wishes III}} = {{User|Best Wishes IIII}} = {{User|Best Wishes IIIIIIIIII}} = {{User|Dog of Tennis God}}

:{{likely}} - {{User|Yechida}}

:{{take note}} - this is very preliminary but I can confirm the above. There are actually dozens more socks here but I need to put a lot of work in to get a definitive answer - Alison ^❤ 00:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

:{{clerknote}} Blocked all the confirmed and the likely one. Leaving the case open. -- lucasbfr ^talk 10:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

:Since some of the accounts have been used for harassment and trolling, I have blocked the main account {{user|Its Pytch.. Hon}} as well. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 14:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

:{{confirmed}} - {{User|Its Pytch.. Hon}} = {{User|Waterbubble}} = {{User|Mazenroe}} = {{User|Motu ultra}} = {{User|John macenroe}} = {{User|Hoegaardenhard}} = {{User|Softballwatch}} = {{User|Aboveitem}} = {{User|44meter}} = {{User|Blowhitsempty}} = {{User|Socialmasturb}} = {{User|Satori the First}} = {{User|Evil Snakes}} = {{User|Jack johnson Final Round}} = {{User|Lad Nav Bandit}} = {{User|Underwear44}} = {{User|Miles Blundell}} = {{User|Lamerflame}} = {{User|Sweating 00}} = {{User|NotmoshBiatch}} = {{User|Cool off 2}} = {{User|Cleaning spam 78}} = {{User|DISEman73}} = {{User|Soap Bar II}} = {{User|Wah Ha Penn}} = {{User|Pfff}} = {{User|Lew Basnight the sixteeth}} = {{User|On to yoko ono}}

:{{IPblock}}

:{{confirmed}} - {{User|Its Pytch.. Hon}} = {{User|Wet Plus}} = {{User|Fando and Lis}} = {{User|Jessica Platt}} = {{User|Lowdark Innuendo}} = {{User|Media Cop}} = {{User|Whitepowderkark}} = {{User|Gowanus Public Bath}} = {{User|Quema Setas}} = {{User|Evendeeper}} = {{User|Southern Flavorite}} = {{User|Clandestino77 }} = {{User|Vincent Gallop}} = {{User|Sensorsenses}} = {{User|181tokansas}} = {{User|Silentsway}} = {{User|Saintermarks}} = {{User|21feiht}} = {{User|Quema Setas}} = {{User|Galop dogma}} = {{User|Mediacop13}} = {{User|Mediashark}} = {{User|Hot Rat 99}} = {{User|Hon Pync}} = {{User|Stroget}} = {{User|Jest911}} = {{User|Takeitfromhere}} = {{User|Spermslidefusion }}

:{{IPblock}} - quite a number of them

: I think that's the lot now - Alison ^❤ 06:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

:: This is great guys... I like it... Yeah... High Commotion... Tight-end Research... Wow... So this is you then... Good... Now send me your resumes... with a picture of each of you and then I will decide who will be part of the company (Group for Happy (talk) 12:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC))

• Accounts blocked. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 12:08, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
• Needless to say, I have also blocked {{vandal|Group for Happy}}. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 12:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

: {{confirmed}} - {{User|Group for Happy}} - also blocked {{User|Yaled Redof}} {{User|Lamedes}} {{User|Dual Amy Lamedes}} and the underlying IP - Alison ^❤ 19:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

::You probably mean {{User|Lamedes Dual}} and {{User|Amy Lamedes}}, correct? ({{User|Dual Amy Lamedes}} doesn't exist, and {{User|Lamedes}} is not blocked.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 12:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

::: Correct, sorry! I got the templates wrong while I was pasting - Alison ^❤ 18:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

{{clerknote}} blocked and tagged remainder. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)