Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jacurek

{{rfcu box|case=Jacurek|filed=08:54, 8 July 2008 (UTC)}}

• {{checkuser|Jacurek}}
• {{checkip|154.20.146.225}}
• {{checkip|70.79.12.228}}

• Code letter: E

• Supporting evidence:It is highly probable that User:Jacurek is revert warring and evading his 4 month block for socking, block evasion and disruption [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Jacurek] as IP 154.20.146.225 and IP 70.79.12.228 at History of Jews in Poland[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/154.20.146.225]. Besides the same pattern of editing, most convincing evidence that IP 154.20.146.225 and Jacurek is the same editor is here: Jacurek forgets to sign his post at talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_the_Jews_in_Poland&diff=prev&oldid=198403128], IP 154.20.146.225 comes to sign it minutes later [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_the_Jews_in_Poland&diff=next&oldid=198403260], and vice versa edit by IP 154.20.146.225[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/History_of_Jews_in_Poland/archive1&diff=prev&oldid=199277887] signed minutes later by Jacurek [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/History_of_Jews_in_Poland/archive1&diff=next&oldid=199277887]. IP 70.79.12.228 displays the same pattern of editing and is coming from the same area as IP 154.20.146.225. Editor Jacurek was blocked for socking and block evasion before (see User:Cvc42) and IP 70.79.12.228 continues reverting the same articles with similar edit summaries as sock Cvc42 did: please compare [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Szmalcownik&diff=prev&oldid=213129431] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Szmalcownik&diff=223970982&oldid=214944413]. --- M0RD00R (talk) 08:54, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

• {{unnecessary}} The first reason not to file a checkuser request (at the top of WP:RFCU says "Obvious, disruptive sock puppet" -- this is an excellent example of that. CheckUser is not needed when the editing is as obvious as this. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 14:09, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

::Yes it is rather obvious case. But there do we go from here then. Should I file it at SSP board?M0RD00R (talk) 20:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

• {{checkuser|Ambor}}. Follow up. This user restored IP 154.20.146.225 edits, with accusation of stalking in edit summary directed at me [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Jews_in_Poland&diff=224629363&oldid=224436943]. Ambor's scope of edits falls in sock's Cvc42 editing history scope Please compare sock's Cvc42 edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rescue_of_the_Danish_Jews&diff=214572311&oldid=209187371], Ambor's edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rescue_of_the_Danish_Jews&diff=prev&oldid=219132092]. M0RD00R (talk) 20:53, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

:{{relisted}} -- lucasbfr ^talk 21:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

• {{confirmed}} that Ambor is Jacurek. Blocked and tagged. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 21:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Now that socking is confirmed, shouldn't anything be done about block evasion by sockpuppeteer? And how about IPs? M0RD00R (talk) 04:50, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

• Something already done: Sam Korn indefblock and tag puppeteer (=Ambor). Sam, please block IP's for suitable length of time, or inform Bishzilla, right here, how long anons be blocked, she do it. bishzilla _ROARR!! 22:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC).
• Minor correction: technically speaking Ambor is not a puppetter, it's a simple sock. Jacurek is a puppetmaster. That's my point. M0RD00R (talk) 22:24, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
• Sorry, yes. As neutral admin, I will consider indef block of Jacurek. bishzilla _ROARR!! 22:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC).
• I have reset the block on Jacurek to another 4 months. I have blocked 154.20.146.225 for three months as it is clearly a static-ish IP. I believe 70.79.12.228 is probably dynamic, so there is no particular point in blocking it at the moment. That do, Bish? Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 22:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
• (ec) Result consideration: Sam Korn already block Jacurek for 4 months, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3AJacurek]. 'Zilla not change duration little Sam's block. bishzilla _ROARR!! 22:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC).

• {{checkip|154.20.89.37}} another IP from Vancouver, BC ranting about persecution of Jacurek [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_the_Jews_in_Poland&diff=225105321&oldid=225101493]. It seems this guy just does not get what block means. M0RD00R (talk) 08:31, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
• I'm sure I don't need to comment about the identification of the user, but I can tell you that a rangeblock is impossible. Each IP is just going to have to be blocked when it comes up. You don't really have to reopen the RFCU -- a post to ANI or to my talk page would be fine. Oh, and the IP is blocked for 48 hours. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 09:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

:::Thank you. Will do just that in future. M0RD00R (talk) 10:16, 12 July 2008 (UTC)