Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LionO

class="messagebox"

| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}
to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Pending&action=edit§ion=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

= LionO =

{{checkuser|LionO}} for user LionO, who is an active editor in the Joe Lieberman wiki page.

Several editors, including me, suspects that the user is working for the DC/CT congressional office for Joe Lieberman.

Some of his contrib is wholesale lifted from Lieberman's campaign and senate website. I also suspect that he

inserted false materials into the page.

Please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-08-04_Joe_Lieberman]

My analysis on his contrib shows that he has never made any addition which is neutral or critical of Lieberman.

He repeated deleted articles which is critical of Liberman without valid cause.

Please see his contrib. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=LionO]

--Stephenzhu [{{fullurl:Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_checkuser|diff=67725263&oldid=67707539}} 22:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC)]

{{declined}} Even if he were, there is no Wikipedia policy against such activities. The Uninvited Co., Inc. [{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser|diff=next&oldid=67725935}} 23:11, 4 August 2006 (UTC)]

{{clerknote}} Taken from non-transcluded text put directly on WP:RFCU -- Kevin_b_er 23:21, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

I think this request should be reconsidered in the interests of full disclosure. How can someone possibly maintain a NPOV if they are being paid to edit?--Wezelboy 00:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Note: Do you even know what checkuser is for? Your request indicated no need for checkuser even if the user is violating policy. --Lord Deskana (talk) 17:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.