Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LuisMatosRibeiro
class="messagebox"
| style="text-align: center" | To create a new request about this user, add |
=== LuisMatosRibeiro ===
- {{checkuser|LuisMatosRibeiro}}
- {{checkip|82.155.54.238}} <-- Main case
- {{checkip|82.155.57.40}}
- {{checkip|82.155.48.143}}
- {{checkip|82.155.214.16}}
- {{checkip|82.155.48.143}}
- {{checkip|82.155.49.15}}
- {{checkip|82.155.49.58}}
- {{checkip|82.155.54.238}}
- {{checkip|82.155.55.12}}
- {{checkip|82.155.57.219}}
- {{checkip|82.155.57.40}}
- {{checkip|82.155.59.65}}
- {{checkip|82.155.61.181}}
- {{checkip|82.155.62.68}}
- Others from same ISP
- Code letter: F
Was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:LuisMatosRibeiro blocked] yesterday for 48h because of serious vandalism and edit warring on Holodomor article. (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Holodomor&action=history history]).
Today, I got a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGrafikm_fr&diff=91435054&oldid=91261164 very "nice" message] on my talk page, about the same subject. This looks like block evasion, and the IP happens to be in Portugal, where the guy is from. He's using the whole range probably because he has a dynamic IP (I provide the whole list of suspects above), but I would like a CheckUser to confirm this. Thanks, Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 19:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
{{Possible}}. He's certainly in that /16, but so are a lot of other people. The decision is going to have to be made on the editing pattern; take it to ANI and ask an uninvolved admin to take a look. Essjay (Talk) 09:06, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.