Login
Login

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mrinal Pandey

class="messagebox"

| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}
to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser&action=edit§ion=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

= [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/The Indian Institute of Planning and Management Sockpuppets|The Indian Institute of Planning and Management Sockpuppets]] =

{{rfcu box|case=The Indian Institute of Planning and Management Sockpuppets|filed=10:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)}}

  • {{checkuser|Addy kundu}}
  • {{checkuser|Deborah Fernandes}}
  • {{checkuser|Joshua Artgobain Benedict}}
  • {{checkuser|Solankikumar}}
  • {{checkuser|Sumitpatel12}}
  • {{checkuser|Ianchapell}}
  • {{checkuser|Maheshbopara}}
  • {{checkuser|Mohit006}}
  • {{checkuser|Fastmovement}}

Possibly related to

  • {{checkuser|Carlisle Rodham}}
  • {{checkuser|Mrinal Pandey}}
  • Code letter: D, and possibly E as well
  • Supporting evidence:

All the accounts I have listed here are involved in this debate who supported a proposal to delete a controversial section, and these accounts have very little edits, and all their userpage sounds like it was written by one person. Deletion of well-cited information is obviously against any sort of consensus in the Wikipedia community and these accounts are obviously created for the sole purpose to skew consensus. I'm also suspecting that User:Carlisle Rodham, and User:Mrinal Pandey, who actively edits the article, may also be involved in this case as well. So far I have blocked all the obvious sockpuppets, which are accounts with few edits, and I just want to make sure that the less obvious sock puppets gets checked before any action are taken. 山本一郎 (会話) 10:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

  • {{clerknote}} Please note that CheckUser {{Admin|Luna-San}} has [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Indian_Institute_of_Planning_and_Management&diff=253146046&oldid=253126990 already ran a CheckUser] and blocked the majority of the involved accounts. Though, a range block may be in order here. Tiptoety talk 20:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

:The following are {{confirmed}} as the same user:

  1. {{vandal|Addy kundu}}
  2. {{vandal|Mrinal Pandey}}
  3. {{vandal|Carlisle Rodham}}
  4. {{vandal|Deborah Fernandes}}
  5. {{vandal|Joshua Artgobain Benedict}}
  6. {{vandal|Sanjay Acer}}
  7. {{vandal|Shilpanayar12}}
  8. {{vandal|Maheshbopara}}
  9. {{vandal|Ianchapell}}
  10. {{vandal|Richapatell}}
  11. {{vandal|Sumitpatel12}}
  12. {{vandal|Solankikumar}}
  13. {{vandal|Abhinavv01}}
  14. {{vandal|Atul005}}
  15. {{vandal|Bigbangboom}}
  16. {{vandal|Kumarsingh}}
  17. {{vandal|Fastmovement}}
  18. {{vandal|Articlesheet}}
  19. {{vandal|Smartarticle}}
  20. {{vandal|Amazingarticle}}
  21. {{vandal|Articlerelease}}
  22. {{vandal|Articlexpert}}
  23. {{vandal|Shilpanayar12}}
  24. {{vandal|Highestheight}}
  25. {{vandal|Whitepaperr}}
  26. {{vandal|Editorrahul}}
  27. {{vandal|Mrs.hidden}}
  28. {{vandal|Missshivani}}
  29. {{vandal|Arjunsingh11}}
  30. {{vandal|PromilaGaur}}
  31. {{vandal|PreetiSehgal}}
  32. {{vandal|PramodMehta}}
  33. {{vandal|NamithaSahu}}
  34. {{vandal|Nancy1986}}
  35. {{vandal|Mohit006}}
  36. {{vandal|Mathewlocker}}
  37. {{vandal|Rawat2008}}
  38. {{vandal|Newsexpress}}
  39. {{vandal|Ravindra Singh Rawat}}
  40. {{vandal|MfginIndia}}
  41. {{vandal|RAVIRAWAT}}
  42. {{vandal|Doublecover}}

Individual IPs and a /21 range blocked. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

{{clerknote}}

:*All accounts indef blocked & tagged;

:*Case renamed to state that {{User|Mrinal Pandey}} is the sockmaster;

:: Tiptoety talk 22:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Another one:

:*{{checkuser|Chocco chips}} (Already blocked) Tiptoety talk 19:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

::{{confirmed}} matches the others. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:27, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


  • {{checkuser|Wifione}}
  • {{checkuser|Empengent}}

ARBCOM Finding of Fact: "Following a review of Jayen466's evidence and a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mrinal_Pandey/Archive#Report_date_June_26_2009.2C_14:50_.28UTC.29 historic CheckUser result], the Committee considers it likely that User:Wifione is a sockpuppet of User:Empengent, formerly Mrinal Pandey. The User:Wifione account was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&dir=prev&limit=1&type=newusers&user=Wifione&page=&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_review_log=1&hide_thanks_log=1 created] and operated while {{user|Empengent}} [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3AEmpengent was blocked]."([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Wifione#Sock_puppetry official ruling]).