Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/NajiimP

{{rfcu box|case=NajiimP|filed=03:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)}}

• {{checkuser|NajiimP}}
• Code Letter:E

• Supporting evidence:

User:JBsupreme has a long history of placing fact tags and making contentious deletions based on lack of citations, as may be seen on his talk page. Today, he deleted a list of cultural references in the article Bowler hat which was 60% of the article, saying, in effect, we other editors didn't know the WP rules. I reverted this, saying it harms content, and is not really permitted in WP:RS for a non-BLP article. At this point, a user with only 2 previous edits to WP, no userpage, and (at that time) no talkpage, user:NajiimP, stepped in to revert me, saying I had no proof. NajiimP's only previous edits to WP had been to place a {fact tag} and move a paragraph to an article on Nintendo stores, back in September. Two edits total, then nothing. Now, today, suddenly, he's here with this third WP-edit ever [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/NajiimP], backing up user:JBsupreme in a very controversial mass deletion of most of an article.

At this point, I put the first-ever note on NajiimP's brandnew talk page, telling him the if he's a sock, he'd better stop. I reverted again, leaving a detailed message on the Bowler hat TALK page, explaining why WP:RS does not apply to primary source material such as who wears a Bowler hat (It's obvious by inspection of primary photos for many of these WP bio articles); and that, in any case, some other ways are possible to fix this problem. No sooner is this done than I'm reverted again by user:NajiimP, with the very-JBsupreme-like language [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bowler_hat&diff=252078839&oldid=252073078|that I don't know the WP rules]. This from a person now with a total of 6 edits (I have about 12,000 by now). So this guy's a sock of somebody; the only question is who. He's doing it to evade 3R along with JBsupreme in a very WP:LAME edit war, but I can think of no other way to stop him, but see who he is. SBHarris 03:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

{{confirmed}} {{user|NajiimP}} = {{user|JacobPowers}} = {{user|MajorJAckalOpe}}

:{{confirmed}} {{user|JBsupreme}} = {{user|Urgblame}} = {{user|FAILBAIT}} = {{user|GARBAGEWOMB}} = {{user|Mariececi}}

:{{inconclusive}} as to if the JBsupreme group = the NajiimP group. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, Rlevse. I presume the right bracketts were left off user:FAILBAIT? I've added them. SBHarris 02:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

::Yep, thanks. Clerks pls handle confirmed users as appropriate. — Rlevse • Talk • 03:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

::: {{Clerk-Note}} All blocked and tagged wit the exception of GARAGEWOMB. There's no such user, please double check the spelling. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 04:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

::::The correct user is {{user|GARBAGEWOMB}}. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 07:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

:{{takenote}} [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJBsupreme&diff=252526345&oldid=252520054 Here] User:Nishkid64 confirmed the checkuser results and commented on the edits of the users. — Rlevse • Talk • 11:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

:{{takenote}} {{User|JBsupreme}} has sense been unblocked. Tiptoety ^talk 06:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

:: He still hasn't explained why CU returns positive results. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 19:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)