Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Plyjacks
= [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Plyjacks|Plyjacks]] =
{{rfcu box|case=Plyjacks|filed=17:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)}}
- {{checkuser|Plyjacks}}
- {{checkuser|Braintreedude28}}
- {{checkuser|Clowniac}}
- {{checkuser|Hankzimer}}
- {{checkuser|Ihjmwt2petwbgwh}}
- {{checkuser|Kegatic}}
- {{checkuser|Kgcodyjam}}
- {{checkuser|Knimper}}
- {{checkuser|Max33well44}}
- {{checkuser|Mcdonaldsfreak82}}
- {{checkuser|Mcmastermm}}
- {{checkuser|Mcmasterofwiki}}
- {{checkuser|Mcwiz6567}}
- {{checkuser|NM76UU}}
- {{checkuser|Randyga7755}}
- {{checkuser|Rm1963}}
- {{checkuser|Rubyrox1907}}
- {{checkuser|Syjacks}}
- {{checkuser|Timaroyhack}}
- {{checkuser|Ufoundme2}}
- {{checkuser|Timmknows}}
- {{checkip|173.48.88.23}}
- Code letter: G
- Supporting evidence: Plyjacks has been, in the past, a serial sockpuppeteer and disruptive influence. However, he recently returned to request an unblock. He claims to have not edited in 2 months, nor created any sockpuppets in that time to evade his original block. Given the belief that people may learn their lesson and that he seems to wish to become a productive editor, I am asking for a checkuser to verify his story. Above is a list of sockpuppets and IP addresses which he is known to have edited under, and which he has admitted publicly to operating. Could a checkuser please see if he is telling the truth? If he is, I plan to bring this to ANI to see if there is consensus to unblock him; we have done similar things in the past for other users who turned over a new leaf. If he is not telling the truth, this will give us the chance to turn him down and return to the rest of our business. Thank you. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 17:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
:The following are Plyjacks socks that are not blocked:
- {{vandal|Timaroyhack21}}
- {{vandal|Kcody114}}
- {{vandal|Timmknows}}
His socks were last active on September 30. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 18:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)