Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Richard Rolles

{{rfcu box|case=Richard Rolles|filed=Cirt (talk) 20:32, 24 October 2008 (UTC)}}

• {{checkuser|Richard Rolles}}
• {{checkuser|Wutudidthere...isawit}}

• Code letter: F

• Supporting evidence: Edits by new user on same topic towards same POV, removing cites from sentences and jeopardizing quality status on a WP:GA article. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Project_Chanology&diff=247441739&oldid=247306570], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Project_Chanology&diff=247442558&oldid=247442403], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Project_Chanology&diff=247443077&oldid=247442763], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Project_Chanology&diff=247443629&oldid=247443365]. {{user|Richard Rolles}} previously confirmed as disruptive sockpuppeteer, see other cases, below. Cirt (talk) 20:32, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Working on this, consulting with other CUs. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:32, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

{{unrelated}} The two listed editors are unrelated. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:47, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

{{rfcu box|case=Richard Rolles|filed=Cirt (talk) 17:03, 5 October 2008 (UTC)}}

• {{checkuser|Richard Rolles}}
• {{checkuser|The Legendary Shadow!}}

• Code letter: F

• Supporting evidence: Similar username to {{user|ShadowVsScientology}}, also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_new_religious_movements&diff=prev&oldid=243207488] interest in same exact area. Evading a block. Cirt (talk) 16:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
• Exactly the same style including the bolding and the preoccupation with me personally. If CU does not support then I can make the case otherwise. --Justallofthem (talk) 22:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

:{{confirmed}} - very! Last time, I blocked the underlying IP for a while, which held them off a while. This time, I'm extending significantly - Alison ^❤ 06:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

::{{clerknote}} {{user|The Legendary Shadow!}} blocked and tagged. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 16:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

{{rfcu box|case=Richard Rolles|filed=Justallofthem (talk) 17:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)}}

• {{checkuser|Richard Rolles}}
• {{checkuser|ShadowVsScientology}}

• Code letter: F

• Supporting evidence: Displays identical interest in Talk:List of new religious movements, harassing me ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FCirt&diff=238085713&oldid=238077887 here]), and has a similar style. There is also very telling off-wiki evidence, please email me if you require details. --Justallofthem (talk) 17:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
• I fail to see the harassment in that diff--more like a profound lack of clue in the conjecture of collusion between Cirt and Justallofthem. No comment on putative off-wiki evidence. Durova^Charge! 18:20, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
• Oh please Durova, I am being accused of being an "OSAbot" - a paid propagandist. I seem to remember you objecting rather strongly when I termed Cirt such. I really wish that you would not let your apparent desire to cover Cirt get the better of you. --Justallofthem (talk) 18:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
• Please note the use of the term "OSAbot" as further evidence of the sock - compare [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_new_religious_movements&diff=prev&oldid=234882261 this edit]. --Justallofthem (talk) 18:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
• Oh, I didn't understand what that meant. Yes, that makes sense now. Looks like the new account has been indeffed anyway over the username issue. Durova^Charge! 18:47, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
• No prop. I would still like the checkuser completed as it reflects on the sockmaster account. --Justallofthem (talk) 18:54, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

{{confirmed}}. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 23:03, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

{{clerknote}} confirmed. blocked. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:13, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

{{rfcu box|case=Richard Rolles|filed=Justallofthem (talk) 04:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)}}

• {{checkuser|Richard Rolles}}
• {{checkuser|Ken Moxon}}

• Code letter: F

• Supporting evidence: Moxon is clearly from enturbulation.org as was indef-blocked Rolles and displays identical interest in Talk:List of new religious movements, harassing me (please see his accusations on the article talk page), and has a similar style. Rolles previously announced his intention to violate his block, please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bibliomaniac15&diff=prev&oldid=234378068 this]. Note also the username is taken from the enturb.org "enemy", Kendrick Moxon. --Justallofthem (talk) 04:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

:{{ confirmed}} - both of them are the same editor, yes. I've also blocked an underlying IP which was used to post comments attacking User:Justallofthem - Alison ^❤ 04:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

::Thanks. --Justallofthem (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)