Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/SixOfDiamonds

{{rfcu box|case=SixOfDiamonds|filed=17:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)}}

• {{checkuser|SixOfDiamonds}}

• {{checkip|70.105.24.127}}
• {{checkip|74.73.16.230 }}
• {{checkip|172.131.137.61}}

• Code letter: E (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=7_World_Trade_Center&action=history]), F.

I saw someone complaining about a block on Jimbo's talk page, and immediately something sounded familiar. Then I remembered SixOfDiamonds, who's been blocked for 3RR recently, and who seems like a new editor to no one. Indeed, all 3 of these IP's appear to be far too articulate for a new editor, and they all add their nonsense POV into 7 World Trade Center. 70.105.24.127 came on to edit soon after Sixofdiamonds was blocked for 3RR violation. Additionally, I and another user think that Sixofdiamonds is probably another user altogether, quite possibly in a ban evasion, though checkuser may or may not be able to prove that. The Evil Spartan 17:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

:SixOfDiamonds likely is a ban evasion. First two edits were to an AFD, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Scholars_for_9/11_Truth_%285th_nomination%29&diff=prev&oldid=137739361] saying how he is "not a single purpose account". --Aude (talk) 18:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

:IP 74.73.16.230 already admitted to being user SixOfDiamonds[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A74.73.16.230&diff=141146999&oldid=141143832]--MONGO 20:52, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

::A reverse DNS would show you these are unrelated. You shouldn't waste peoples time just because the AfD went against your personal view point. While 2 are Verizon, one is an entirely different state ... The other is an AOL account, the final seems to be a private owned IP as it does not resolve. Such horrible accusations because of an opposing view point. Just to add the fact that I still have this IP also shows its static. --74.73.16.230 02:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

{{Unrelated}}. Voice-of-All 23:19, 30 June 2007 (UTC)