Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tecmobowl

{{rfcu box|case=Tecmobowl|filed=17:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)}}

• {{checkuser|Tecmobowl}}

• {{checkuser|Mrdrip}}

• Code letter: F
• Supporting evidence:

Several months back, {{checkuser|Jmfangio}} was blocked as a sock puppet of the banned Techmobowl. Mrdrip showed up today and instantly started warring with {{User|Chrisjnelson}} over NFL Pro Bowl naming conventions. This was a key element of the dispute that was the subject of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jmfangio-Chrisjnelson. --B (talk) 17:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

• {{takenote}} I blocked Mrdrip as a sockpuppet of {{user|Tecmobowl}}. I just came across the RFCU after seeing the user's talk page. Nishkid64 (talk) 23:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
• Does this mean the checkuser has been done or is the block based on edit patterns? --B (talk) 01:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• The CheckUser has not been done. I based the block solely on the editing pattern. Nishkid64 (talk) 01:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Hmm ... I'd say it's about 75% that it's him, 20% that it's a reincarnation of someone else and 5% that it's a real new user. But I hope, in the off chance that 5% is right, we haven't succeeded in biting a newbie. --B (talk) 01:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

:The old guys are stale. Can you find the first CU operator and see if they saved the stats onto a hard drive? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

::{{clerknote}} I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Morven&diff=179101869&oldid=178643900 asked] Morven if he has the old data from the Jmfangio-Tecmobowl CheckUser analysis he ran a few months back. Nishkid64 (talk) 02:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

:::This is probably moot as it's been 11 days since the account has been indefblocked and he hasn't protested his innocence. But can someone record Mrdrip's data so that if/when he makes another sock, we can have something to check it against? --B (talk) 14:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

:::: It'll be in the checkuser logs from here now, and should be discoverable later. I think we can go for close on this one now - Alison ^❤ 14:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

:::::{{clerknote}} Morven replied to my note on his talk page. He [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nishkid64&diff=181556262&oldid=181508447 states] that he could not find any records of the Tecmobowl CU request. Nishkid64 (talk) 07:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

::::::Has anyone asked Jpgordon? He made the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Tecmobowl&diff=140963366&oldid=137941630 first likely sock determination] that largely contributed to Tecmobowl being community-banned in the first place. —Wknight94 (talk) 12:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

:{{clerknote}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpgordon&diff=181683729&oldid=181675706] Jpgordon says he does not have any notes on the CU request. Nishkid64 (talk) 21:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

{{rfcu box|case=Tecmobowl|filed=07:29, 12 June 2007 (UTC)}}

• {{checkuser|Tecmobowl}}

• {{checkuser|El redactor}}

• Code letter: F

As described [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=137629429#Tecmobowl_and_possible_sockpuppetry in this report on WP:ANI], Tecmobowl may have employed El redactor as an abusive sockpuppet to reinsert a link to his own website into an article while he was blocked. John254 07:29, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

:{{clerknote}} moving a discussion where user:El redactor denies being a sockpuppet to the talk page. Please keep the discussion there. -- lucasbfr ^talk 16:26, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

{{Unrelated}}. Voice-of-All 05:01, 14 June 2007 (UTC)