Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/The Cunctator

class="messagebox"

| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}
to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser&action=edit§ion=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

= [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/The Cunctator|The Cunctator]] =

{{rfcu box|case=The Cunctator|filed=02:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)}}

  • {{checkuser|The Cunctator}}
  • {{checkuser|User At Work}}
  • Code letter: G

There is strong evidence that The Cunctator has employed User At Work as an abusive sockpuppet to violate WP:BLP on {{la|Grover Norquist}}, as described on Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Abusive_sockpuppetry_by_The_Cunctator. John254 02:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh, good lord. There's no need for a checkuser. User At Work is an account I use for perfectly legitimate reasons. John254's claims of abusiveness are beyond laughable. He's literally complaining about a single edit that he disagreed with. --The Cunctator 04:15, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.