Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Sbakuria

This is a summary written by users who are concerned by this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.

User discusses opinions on article with others before editing. User also follows Wikipedia:Manual of Style.

Sbakuria ignores requests to discuss the changes they make to the article. The user [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_Mashkevitch&diff=prev&oldid=305319772 changes] to a poorly formatted and promotional version of the article. Several attempts have been made to engage the user in discussion, but all have been completely ignored and the user's reverts continue.

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

:#Earlier difference between versions http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_Mashkevitch&diff=next&oldid=300558950

:#Difference showing same revert behaviour http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_Mashkevitch&diff=303583104&oldid=303175290

:# Wikipedia:Neutral point of view

:# Wikipedia:Manual of Style

:# Wikipedia:Consensus

:# Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

:# Repeated attempts on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sbakuria&oldid=305330157#Alexander_Mashkevitch user talk] page have been unsuccessful

(Provide diffs to demonstrate that the disputed behavior continued after trying to resolve the dispute.)

:# Difference following repeated attempts to engage in discussion with user http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_Mashkevitch&diff=305319772&oldid=305296258

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

:# Rtdixon86 (talk) 20:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

:# PhilKnight (talk) 20:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

:# Bricklayer (talk) 13:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

:#

:#

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

User most likely isn't going to respond to any request to discuss his or her edits. If Sbakuri continues this behavior then a block will probably be effective for the user to look back on his/her edits.

Users who endorse this summary:

1. Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 21:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
2. His preferred version appears to be a copyright violation, so escalating blocks can probably be used from now on. PhilKnight (talk) 20:45, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Users who endorse this summary:

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.

{{userlinks|Sbakuria}} indefinitely blocked.

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.