Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia proposals

{{rfcquote|text=

Should the English Wikipedia community adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and affiliates?

This is a statement-and-agreement-style RfC. 05:05, 29 May 2025 (UTC)}}

Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons

{{rfcquote|text=

This RfC proposes improving the wording of the existing WP:BLPCRIME policy. The intent is {{strong|not to change the policy or principles}}. The goal is to make the guidance {{strong|clearer and easier to apply}}. Below is the current wording followed by the proposed revision.

Current version

:{{tq|A living person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until convicted by a court of law. Accusations, investigations, arrests and charges do not amount to a conviction. For individuals who are not public figures—that is, individuals not covered by {{section link||Public figures}}—editors must seriously consider {{strong|not}} including material{{efn|name=namerfc}}—in any article—that suggests the person has committed or is accused of having committed a crime, unless a conviction has been secured for that crime.}}

:{{tq|If different judicial proceedings result in seemingly contradictory outcomes that do not overrule each other,{{efn|For example, O. J. Simpson was acquitted in 1995 of the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, but was later found liable for their wrongful deaths in a civil trial.}} include sufficient explanatory information.}}

Proposed version

:{{tq|A living person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until convicted by a court of law. Accusations, investigations, arrests, and charges do not amount to a conviction. For individuals who are not public figures—that is, individuals not covered by {{section link||Public figures}}—editors must seriously consider not including material{{efn|name=namerfc}}—in any article—that suggests the person has committed or is accused of committing a crime, unless a conviction has been secured. If different judicial proceedings result in seemingly contradictory outcomes that do not overrule each other,{{efn|For example, O. J. Simpson was acquitted in 1995 of the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, but was later found liable for their wrongful deaths in a civil trial.}} sufficient explanatory information should be included.}}

:{{tq|When deciding whether to name a living or recently deceased person in connection with a crime, editors should assess the stage of proceedings as a spectrum: {{strong|person of interest < arrested < charged < on trial < convicted}}. The earlier the stage, the higher the threshold for inclusion. Names should rarely be included for persons of interest. For convicted individuals, names are generally appropriate unless exceptional circumstances apply. For intermediate stages, editors must carefully weigh factors such as the extent and quality of reliable sourcing, whether the subject is a minor, and the person’s public status.}}

Please comment below. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 15:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)}}

{{RFC list footer|prop|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }}