Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 March 3

Just hoping for an eagle eye editor on the language! Thanks everyone.

Saskiawb (talk) 06:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I've added an article in place of the redirect page, with citations.

Letterman72 (talk) 07:47, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Greetings! Should this article talk even more about the new consumer experience and ability to combine old-fashioned traditional tailor making with an online experience where you can be a designer. Elaborate more on ready-to-wear vs. Tailormade or should it talk more about this new way of getting a shopping experience both for retailers and consumers. Scanning/personal meeting reordering and crowd source designing online?

Thanks for input!

Mats Utberg (talk) 10:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello everybody!

Please, review my article about an online dating site. Advice, critics and suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thanx

ITsupergirl (talk) 12:54, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

This article is about a famous person.who write a book at the age of fifteen.He become famous too.

Gerrygogna (talk) 13:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I've responded to previous comments (thank you Tkotc!). Can anyone tell me if my article is now officially ready for mainspace? Or will it be automatically deleted if I try to post it at this time?.. Thanks!

SheldonCohen (talk) 15:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I'd appreciate it if someone could tell me if this article is ready for posting on mainspace, or will it be automatically deleted?

Any suggestions for improvements are also appreciated. Thank you!

SheldonCohen (talk) 15:45, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

My first attempt at an article. Any suggestions on how this can be improved would be appreciated. This article is about the history of the Magnolia House and the prominent family that built the home.

SaundersCW (talk) 16:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Is this article ready to be published? I have reference it from an article online.

JBMTI (talk) 16:55, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

LiveDebtFree (talk) 19:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Hey, I'd really appreciate some feedback on this in terms of eligibility; the article's been attempted and blocked more than once, so this seems like a good avenue. Thanks!

Fixedfrequencies (talk) 20:20, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

This page is about the International Indian Treaty Council, a non-profit organization, that assists Indigenous peoples with issues that may interfere with their sovereignty rights, environmental rights, and human rights.

Treatycouncil (talk) 20:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello, please could you review this article, thank you.

Mpjwaring (talk) 20:59, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I have written the entry and then tried to fix it and improve it in various ways. It has not been reviewed and approved.

Mcthehammer (talk) 21:02, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

:I cleaned up some formatting, minor changes you may want to review. There are no inline references in your article. I'm assuming your subject meets wikipedia:notability (academics) criterion 6. If you are not going to add any references (you really should, if possible), then remove the empty References section. I removed the "unreviewed article" template. Tkotc (talk) 06:36, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

I am requesting a peer-review of this article to ensure that it meets Wikipedia guidelines.

Thank you.

Jimtac (talk) 22:48, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Buhtelka (talk) 23:10, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do take time to review this article. Thank you

I already make some cleaning on my article. Can you take a look and give me more comments about it? Thank you Vinh 20:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)