Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Flashplayer/UGOPlayer Encyclopedic

• {{user|Fagstein}}
• {{user|Sbloemeke}}

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:

:Article talk pages:

:*Wikipedia_talk:UGOPLAYER http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:UGOPlayer

::Can be viewed in the talk page, at the bottom, that both parties are awair

• [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:3o WP:3o]
• [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/UGOPlayer Deletion Attempt]

• Whether the content of the article, specifically the "The Site" section is neutral or verified.
• Whether the content of the article, specifically the "The Forum" section, and even more specifically the history section is notable.

• Whether the content of the article, specifically the "Content" section is encyclopedic and notable.
• Whether the content of the article, specifically the "The Forum" section and its history section is notable.
• Whether a "Top 10" list of animations and/or authors is notable for its own sake.
• Whether a poll conducted on a website is a proper source for an article on that website.

:All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.

• Agree. Sbloemeke 19:21, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Agree. Fagstein 20:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Accept: I have a small concern that the parties may be expecting more from mediation than we can offer; the issues are phrased in a way that suggests they are looking for a binding decision from someone else. Mediators don't make such decisions; we help parties come to an agreement about such questions. As long as the parties are aware that the mediator will not be issuing a judgment, we should be fine.

::For the Mediation Committee, Essjay ^{Talk • Contact} 05:44, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: Sbloemeke hasn't edited besides the two day interval on February 20 and 21. Is this mediation still necessary? Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 16:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• I agree with Flcelloguy; mediation is closed, but may be reopened at the parties' request. Essjay ^{Talk • Contact} 10:56, 15 March 2006 (UTC)