Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Google bomb

{{Closed case|10:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)|Successful}}

• {{user|Insider201283}}
• {{user|Seraphimblade}}

• Google_bomb

• Talk:Google_bomb#Quixtar

• 1. Should the section regarding an alleged Quixtar initiated google bomb be included at all?
• 2. Should a blog article alleging something and quoting an anonymous source quoting someone else be considered a valid primary source?
• 3. Should the presence of a column on another website quoting that blog article be considered a valid supporting secondary source?

• Agree. --Insider201283 20:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Agree. --Seraphimblade 21:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

• Accept:

::For the Mediation Committee, —Guanaco 02:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

:::I was originally mediating this case for the mediation cabal, but didn't actually begin talking as I was trying to consume the talkpage. I'd like to take it as a demonstration of my abilities for my candidacy to the mediation committee if no-one involved has any objection. I will read through what I can find and then contact the disputants accordingly. —Xyrael / 19:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

:::Now being mediated over e-mail. —Xyrael / 21:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

::::This case has reached a solution and the participants are going to incorporate this into the article by themselves. —Xyrael / 10:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

{{Closed case/bottom}}