Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Extended confirmed#User%3ABoutboul

{{WP:PERM/Subpage|shortcut=EC|subpage=Extended_confirmed|notice=

• Before making a request here, you should be aware that accounts are automatically granted this group after 30 days and 500 edits.
• This access is only required for editing highly contentious pages that have in most cases been protected by the Arbitration Committee or by community consensus under the 30/500 category. A list of these articles is found here.
• Unless you are requesting confirmation for a legitimate alternate account your request will almost certainly be denied.

}}

• {{rfplinks|1=Jensenjan}}

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights

My EC/XC status was suspended with extended conformed restriction due to a mistake in Special:Diff/1296492089. The status was removed by Star Mississippi, who said that I was welcome to reapply, after explaining myself, especially contradicting that I had won my status through gaming. After checking my editorial history, there was general agreement in the discussion that that was not the case. The discussion is located in: Jensenjan and WP:XC WP:GAMING

I am now more careful with unintentionally wading into sensitive subjects and I continue to edit less controversial entries.I respectfully ask to have my EC/XC status reinstalled. Jensenjan (talk) 11:07, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{comment|Automated comment}} This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User:Jensenjan&type=rights&offset=20250620212812&limit=1]). — MusikBot ^talk 11:10, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

: {{pb}}This request should be declined. The claim {{!xt|"After checking my editorial history, there was general agreement in the discussion that that was not the case."}} is not consistent with the contents of the noticeboard discussion at {{slink|WP:ANI#Jensenjan and WP:XC WP:GAMING}}. The editor who encouraged Jensenjan to reapply for this permission shortly after it was revoked gave poor advice, as they have also engaged in permission gaming. — Newslinger talk 18:28, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

:: Actually, as the discussion {{slink|WP:ANI#LordDiscord's gaming of the extended confirmed permission}} concluded that the other editor was not permission gaming, I withdraw my opposition and now support Jensenjan's request for the extended confirmed permission. I do believe Jensenjan was editing in good faith, and the community has established that small edits, when constructive, do count toward the threshold for obtaining extended confirmed. — Newslinger talk 20:13, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

:::Has the community established that? That was a very brief discussion in the LordDiscord's thread, which was initially closed within 2 hours and with limited participation. TarnishedPath^talk 00:51, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

:Just commenting that I have no input to add on the request and am fine with whatever the reviewing admin decides. Star Mississippi 02:33, 27 June 2025 (UTC)