Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adhan24/Archive

{{SPIcat}}

• {{checkuser|Mathsci}}
• {{checkuser|Ramdrake}}
• {{checkuser|Slrubenstein}}
• {{checkuser|Muntuwandi}}

An Arbcom case is in progress regarding Race related issues. Adhan24 popped up in the last few days and has started making some pretty extreme POV edits, possibly as a form of provocation. It may just be a new user, who I will be happy to give some guidance to, but would appreciate confimation. The listed 'socks' are established users which I believe Adnan24 may be a sock of. mikemikev (talk) 03:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

See Defending yourself against claims.

This frivolous and disruptive request has been included as evidence in the ArbCom case. Mathsci (talk) 22:09, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

• You are going to need a lot more than "they edit the same topic area" to justify a CheckUser being ran, let alone any blocks being issued. This to me looks like a bad faith attempt to get back at those who have disagreed with you. Tiptoety ^talk 03:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

::Eh? How would a check user be a way to 'get back' at someone if they were innocent? I'm not trying to get back at anyone. But do as you will. mikemikev (talk) 10:47, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

• {{admin-note}} I don't see any strong behavioral connection in any case, certainly not nearly enough to DUCK by (and I really don't think that there is enough evidence to Checkuser by, but it's not my call to make.). NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 17:47, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
• {{Decline}} - This is bordering on {{fishing}}. There's no behavioral evidence to support this socking, and without a clear sockmaster, CU is invalid here. CU is for finding socks of a sockmaster, not the other way around. (X! · talk)  · @784  ·  17:49, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

----