Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aidayoung/Archive

__TOC__

{{SPIarchive notice|1=Aidayoung}}

{{SPIpriorcases}}

=28 August 2018=

==Suspected sockpuppets==

  • {{checkuser|1=Emma1990227}}
  • {{checkuser|1=Le_luxembourgeois}}
  • {{checkuser|1=Nonchalant77}}

  • Tools: [https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py Editor interaction utility] • [https://tools.wmflabs.org/interaction-timeline?wiki=enwiki Interaction Timeline] • [https://tools.wmflabs.org/betacommand-dev/cgi-bin/uc?uc=Aidayoung User compare report] Auto-generated every hour.

Due to an active invasions of low active users to protect the page from deletion, I am asking to check the relation of User:Aidayoung, User:Le luxembourgeois, User:Emma1990227 and User:Nonchalant77. They write in the same style and often forget to put a signature. Russians Don`t give up (talk) 23:15, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

==<big>Comments by other users</big>==

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The accusation is ridiculous. I am an old contributor to Wikipedia and never needed to use these stupid tactics, which I completely repudiate. I never heard of the other users, except that they voted against the deletion of one of the pages I created, which seems a serious crime for the Russian critic. Investigations are welcome.Aidayoung (talk) 23:53, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

==<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==

{{unrelated}}, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

----

=28 November 2019=

==Suspected sockpuppets==

  • {{checkuser|1=Pierre2M}}

  • Tools: [https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users={{urlencode:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}&users={{urlencode:Aidayoung}} Editor interaction utility] • [https://tools.wmflabs.org/interaction-timeline?wiki=enwiki&user={{urlencode:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}&user={{urlencode:Aidayoung}} Interaction Timeline] • [https://tools.wmflabs.org/betacommand-dev/UserCompare/{{urlencode:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}.html User compare report] Auto-generated every hour.

User:Aidayoung has [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=928292136#User:Aidayoung_inserting_fringe/promotion,_removing_sourced_content_despite_warnings,_potential_COI been brought to ANI] for PROMOTION/COI with regard to Massimo Introvigne. User:Pierre2m has only one edit, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Massimo_Introvigne&diff=928226439&oldid=924818243 deleting] material critical of Introvigne with the accusation that it is promotional. It seems entirely plausible that this is non-coincidental. Feoffer (talk) 03:05, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

==<big>Comments by other users</big>==

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This case should be moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aidayoung, Aidayoung is the oldest account. The earlier case was filed by User:Russians Don`t give up who turned out to be a sock. JimRenge (talk) 03:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

:Yes, Aidayoung´s edit history does suggest that she may have a conflict of interest concerning Massimo Introvigne and CESNUR. It also appears possible that Pierre2M is a sock of Aidayoung. Aidayoung and Feoffer are "opponents" in an unresolved content dispute on CESNUR (see also talk page CESNUR) and Pierre2M made only one edit. Please consider to include technical evidence in your decision. Thanks JimRenge (talk) 09:38, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

==<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==

  • {{Clerk note}} Case moved. — JJMC89(T·C) 05:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Insufficient evidence. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

----