Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArafatHassanWiKi

{{SPI case status|checked}}

{{sock list|1=DarkTI|2=Welcome to Pandora|3=NisoBird|tools_link=yes}}

Associated with user:Johnvola who was blocked as a sock of ArafatHassanWiKi. Page Ahmed Jobaer created by DarkTI in March 2025. The page was previously draftified and deleted after being created by users Welcome to Pandora and NisoBird (now blocked as a sock of this farm). CNMall41 (talk) 00:37, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

:Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• The two unblocked accounts appear unrelated to each other. DarkTI has been socking though. I'd put it at confirmed {{sock list|DarkTI|Renamed user e38c90a65d9363cd5c2aa47d61303cf7|note2=This one could maybe stand to be unvanished.|TahiHasan|TahiBoss|Rtksss|HasibHimel}} It looks like {{U|MarioGom}} noticed part of this connection but I'm not sure where the warning originated. As for connection to master, based on historical networking I'd say that's a possible for the group identified. Very spammy ranges but both primary ranges overlapping with historicals. Izno (talk) 04:03, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
• :{{u|Izno}}: The only account here that looks familiar is Welcome to Pandora which I think is related to the BoraVoro case. For the others, I'd need some additional pointer to refresh my mind. MarioGom (talk) 10:09, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
• Blocking IDd group. Izno (talk) 04:05, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
• Looks resolved, closing. NativeForeigner ^Talk 23:22, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
• It is not resolved {{U|NativeForeigner}}. Users are blocked but establishing a link to master has not been done and the group I blocked is untagged. Izno (talk) 02:06, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
• What am I missing? Did you block users without tagging waiting for some other patroller to do so? It's been a while since I've patrolled SPI but typically when I still had the CU hat standard practice as to action the whole bit. I spot checked a couple which were tagged, but just made the assumption if the two that I checked where tagged the whole set would have been. I see there's a backlog here and am sympathetic, but back in my day I'd have actioned as CU as given technical details I'd best be able to do so so just assumed when I saw several tagged they all would be. NativeForeigner ^Talk 06:24, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
• :{{tq|Did you block users without tagging waiting for some other patroller to do so?}} Yes, because there has been abusive sockpuppetry. However, as I said on 29 May, no-one has established that the group I blocked is the master, so I have not tagged. If the group is the master, they should be tagged as ArafatHassanWiKi. If the group is not the master, they should be tagged as TahiBoss.
• :I was quite recently told to ensure tags are on user pages before sending to closed. Izno (talk) 17:37, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
• ::Thanks. I haven't been active at SPI in years so I think just slight shifts in how we do things. I'll action this evening if it's not yet done. NativeForeigner ^Talk 17:16, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

----