Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pci world/Archive
{{SPIarchive notice|Pci world}}
{{SPIpriorcases}}
===<big>30 October 2010</big>===
{{SPIcat}}
====<span style="font-size:150%"> Suspected sockpuppets </span>====
- {{checkuser|1=Shiasp101}}
- {{checkuser|1=Ari4eva}}
- {{checkuser|1=LTD1959}}
====<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Ttonyb1|Ttonyb1]] </span>====
Appears accounts created to support "Keep" for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Bowie. Accounts are all SPA and lacking other article edits. ttonyb (talk) 01:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
====<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====
====<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====
====<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====
All {{confirmed}} as the same, plus
- {{checkuser|Kivieb}} TNXMan 15:14, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- {{adminnote}} All tagged and blocked. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 15:20, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
----
===<big>02 November 2010</big>===
{{SPIcat}}
====<span style="font-size:150%"> Suspected sockpuppets </span>====
- {{checkuser|1=InformationWare}}
====<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Daedalus969|Daedalus969]] </span>====
This sock wasn't caught in the first sweep, but it's obviously the same person per the editing style(signing before post, talking the same way about the same stuff). It seems they tried to evade appearing as a sock by using the same style of markup as the signature of the user who was striking the votes by the sock/meatpuppets. CU is needed for another rangeblock, sleeper check. I mean, they obviously got around the first one, and evaded CU the first time. — Dædαlus Contribs 08:38, 2 November 2010 (UTC)