Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Planeandaquariumgeek

__TOC__

{{SPIarchive notice|Planeandaquariumgeek}}

{{SPIpriorcases}}

=23 June 2025=

{{SPI case status|close}}

==Suspected sockpuppets==

{{sock list|1=197.211.63.33|tools_link=yes}}

Planeandaquariumgeek made a string of reverts of WP:AIRSPECS changes and maintenance tag additions at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Airbus_A350&curid=1006446&diff=1296908784&oldid=1296775317 Airbus A350], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boeing_707&curid=67409&diff=1296908928&oldid=1296249611 Boeing 707], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boeing_720&diff=next&oldid=1296909038 Boeing 720], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boeing_717&curid=152437&diff=1296909318&oldid=1296085767 Boeing 717], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boeing_727&diff=prev&oldid=1296909483 Boeing 727], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boeing_737&curid=149697&diff=1296908522&oldid=1296875683 Boeing 737], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boeing_737_Classic&curid=15103676&diff=1296909574&oldid=1295798333 Boeing 737 Classic], and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boeing_737_Next_Generation&curid=17670854&diff=1296909671&oldid=1296165282 Boeing 737 Next Generation] shortly before being blocked for personal attacks (see this ANI case).

Only five hours after Planeandaquariumgeek's block, this IP has just made a string of similar reverts at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Airbus_A220&diff=prev&oldid=1296984893 Airbus A220], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Airbus_A330&curid=164939&diff=1296985305&oldid=1296634131 Airbus A330], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Airbus_A330neo&diff=prev&oldid=1296985215 Airbus A330neo], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Airbus_A350&curid=1006446&diff=1296966588&oldid=1296965022 Airbus A350], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boeing_737_Next_Generation&curid=17670854&diff=1296984155&oldid=1296913913 Boeing 737 Next Generation], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comac_C909&diff=prev&oldid=1296985082 Comac 909], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comac_C919&diff=prev&oldid=1296984991 Comac C919], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embraer_E-Jet_family&diff=prev&oldid=1296984811 Embraer E-Jet family], and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embraer_E-Jet_E2_family&diff=prev&oldid=1296984727 Embraer E-Jet E2 family]. This appears to be a clear case of block evasion. ZLEA T\C 15:07, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

==<big>Comments by other users</big>==

:Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

==<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==

  • I've blocked the IP as an apparent proxy. I agree the activity looks similar and might suggest {{U|Tamzin}} notch the account's block up a day or three for the evasion. Izno (talk) 20:25, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
  • :@Izno: It's similar, but it's also autistic-special-interest editing, which generates a lot of behavioral similarities, and we know there's been off-wiki attention on this particular dispute. I'm not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that this is the same person. Like more than 50%, probably, but not at my usual blocking threshold. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 02:14, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

----