Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pptweddie/Archive
{{SPIarchive notice|Pptweddie}}
{{SPIpriorcases}}
=== <big>Report date October 13 2009, 16:06 (UTC)</big>===
{{SPIcat}}
====== Suspected sockpuppets ======
- {{checkuser|1=Alarsen777}}
- {{checkuser|1=Monday009}}
====<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:4wajzkd02|4wajzkd02]] </span>====
WP:SOSP#Editing identical articles: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Los_Angeles_Film_School&curid=4877501&action=history Revision history of Los Angeles Film School], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Film_school&curid=1329877&action=history Revision history of Film school]
WP:SOSP#Edit warring: See history, referenced above. In summary:
Los Angeles Film School
1 edits by Pptweddie
1 identical edit by Alarsen777
2 identical edits by Monday009
Film school
3 identical edits by Pptweddie
1 identical edit by Alarsen777
3 identical edits by Monday009
WP:SOSP#Similar writing/editing styles: All edits were identical, adding the following sentence with spam external link to the lede: "
On the Internet you can find many websites with free articles where you can find out everything you need about. http://www.filmschools-info.com/ is one of them."
WP:SPA: See contribs. All accounts only used to add external links to the following:
1. Special:Contributions/Pptweddie: Hearing aid (added spam link in similar fashion, which was also reverted by another editor), Film school, Los Angeles Film School
2. Special:Contributions/Alarsen777: Film school, Los Angeles Film School
3. Special:Contributions/Monday009: Film school, Los Angeles Film School
Also note the increasingly misleading edit summaries used by these accounts:
1. Pptweddie: first edits to articles state "Just posted few websites with free articles", with edits inappropriately marked as "Minor". Final edit summary states "I think it's very constructive, because this page helped me a lot, and I'm on UCLA, and my friend who recommend me that page is Magna cum laude on UCLA, but I'm glad that someone watching here;)"
2. Alarsen777: all edit summaries state "Minor edit...put some webpages with free articles about this subject", with edits inappropriately marked as "Minor".
3. Monday009: all edit summaries state "Just correct some things", with edits inappropriately marked as "Minor".
====<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====
====<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====
====<span style="font-size:150%"> CheckUser requests </span>====
{{RFCU| F| No2ndletter | Checked }} Requested by 4wajzkd02 (talk) 16:06, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
{{Endorsed}} - There may be more socks that haven't edited yet. The three accounts have a similar pattern of editing, but it might be wise to check for more. Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 19:56, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
====<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====
====<span style="font-size:150%"> Conclusions </span>====
- {{confirmed}} Alarsen777 = Monday009 = Pptweddie. After looking at a pair of /19's that this user was on - I don't see any sleepers at this time. --Versageek 20:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Blocked. — Jake Wartenberg 21:57, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
{{SPIclose|archive}}
----