Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Srobak/Archive

;Suspected sockpuppets

• {{checkuser|1=Yooperkawi}}

• [http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/uc?uc=Srobak User compare report] Auto-generated every hour.

User:Srobak indefinitely blocked on 7 January 2012.

User:Yooperkawi appears on 8 January 2012 as a fully formed editor.

Immediately edits an article which was last edited by User:Srobak on 1 January 2012 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Acid_jazz&action=history], follows that by reverting another article to the last edit by User:Srobak [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beats_by_Dr._Dre&action=history], then comments within a section of a talk page User:Srobak created on 31 October 2011 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Twitter&action=history], and then edits an article which was last edited by User:Srobak on 30 December 2011 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Third_Watch&action=history]‎. memphisto 20:51, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

:{{adminnote}} Srobak was blocked, not banned. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• {{adminnote}} Per WP:DUCK I've blocked and tagged the sock. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:27, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

----

;Suspected sockpuppets

• {{checkuser|1=2ChannelGod}}

• [http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/uc?uc=Srobak User compare report] Auto-generated every hour.
• [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/editorinteract.html Editor interaction utility]

Srobak [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ktr101&diff=410656750&oldid=prev left a message] on my talk page back in the day regarding "JBLM Lewis McChord", which was followed up in 2013 by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ktr101&diff=410656750&oldid=prev this edit] by 2ChannelGod on my page, using the same style of writing (including saying "Thanks." at the end of the message). 2Channel has never edited the page before now, so I suspect that they are using the same watchlist as Srobak, as they have multiple overlaps. Furthermore, both users seem to be taking a vigilante approach to the sites that they have both edited together, discouraging people from doing certain edits without a history of editing on the page. Finally, they have very similar edit summaries, which don't normally fall into the range of the average user's summaries. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

:I presume you meant [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKtr101&diff=535620125&oldid=535617720 this] as the second diff. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 05:06, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Obvious WP:DUCK, blocked, tagged, closing. Rschen7754 09:16, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

----

{{sock list|1=Picard's Facepalm|tools_link=yes}}

See {{u|GreenLipstickLesbian}}'s extensive report at AN/I. voorts (talk/contributions) 04:47, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

:Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Permalink to investigation: Special:Permalink/1278135000#Tracking other users' behavior in userspace. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:04, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• {{btc}} voorts (talk/contributions) 04:49, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

----