Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Titodutta/Archive#Titodutta

;Suspected sockpuppets

• {{checkuser|1=CorrectKnowledge}}

• [http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/uc?uc=Titodutta User compare report] Auto-generated every hour.

This comment [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABhagavad_Gita&diff=503142380&oldid=503142247 here], where he says "I made changes." But actually the person who made the changes was CorrectKnowledge. Please see this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bhagavad_Gita&diff=503137333&oldid=503101484 diff]. So that doesn't make much sense, unless they are both the same person. BrahmanAdvaita (talk) 17:11, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

::See the link there in my post. Will make sense, I think! --Tito Dutta ✉ 17:52, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Can someone do the SPI investigation quickly please? I have lots of other works! Thanks!--Tito Dutta ✉ 17:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

• Tito, there is nothing to prevent you from carrying on as before. Clerk, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASitush&diff=503153259&oldid=503152978 this comment] by CorrectKnowledge on my talk page appears to be instructive. Even before it was posted , I believed this to be a good faith but incorrect report. The assumption is a Freudian slip but the history of these two users suggests otherwise. - Sitush (talk) 19:30, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

::Okay, then, Sitush, please comment from neutral point of view. I am copy pasting the same post which has been mentioned above, please read it–

::{{cquote|1= Incorrect! See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABhagavad_Gita&diff=503141861&oldid=503141734#Gita_Date_3102.21" here], I proposed the change, you did not post any comment, but when I made changes, you came into scene immediately. This time too you have come into scene when the edit is done}}

::– 1) Now there is a link added in my post (the word "here"), please click on the link to see which proposal I was talking about. You will find it is a similar but old discussion!

::2) Also read it full, the last sentence begins with– This time too you have come into scene when the edit is done – does not it clearly indicate a) I am talking about the previous incident? b) I have not made the edit? Now, please tell me, where was the Freudian slip? --Tito Dutta ✉ 10:27, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

{{declined}} - The evidence against Titodutta and CorrectKnowledge is too ambiguous to warrant an invasion of privacy such as a checkuser. It is also too vague to pass the WP:DUCK test and link these two editors together.--v/r - TP 16:00, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

----