Login
Login

Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/September/1

=September 1=

== {{cl|Napoleonic Wars (1792-1815) stubs}} ==

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename/rescope per Grutness

Moved from CFD - Her Pegship (tis herself) 16:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

:Propose renaming :Category:Napoleonic Wars (1792-1815) stubs to :Category:Napoleonic Wars (1792–1815) stubs

:Nominator's rationale: Rename. WP:DASH —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

  • Oppose the use of difficult-to-replicate characters in category names, WP:MOS be damned. Otto4711 (talk) 07:19, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Rename per nom and WP:DASH. Making an en dash is no harder than making a letter capitalized without using the caps lock button. Good Ol’factory (talk) 09:15, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Move this discussion to WP:SFD, I will. :P Her Pegship (tis herself) 16:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

----

----

  • Shouldn't this simply be at {{cl|Great French War stubs}}, to follow the permcat? Alai (talk) 01:24, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
  • It's a little confused. There seems to be more than one relevant permcat - there's also {{cl|Napoleonic Wars}}, and the text in the category suggests that {{cl|French Revolutionary Wars}} would also apply. Great French War seems to imply that it's the more all-encompassing term, though. This might also mean renaming the template, of course (or creating other upmerged templates, if you prefer), but at least it would get around the hyphen problem. Support rename/rescope to {{cl|Great French War stubs}}, and moving the current template to {{tl|GreatFrenchWar-stub}} (keeping the current template name as a redirect). Grutness...wha? 01:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
  • The intent seems clearly to be the wider scope, from the text on the category, and indeed the dates (that are causing the initial trouble) in the present category name. Upmerged templates and/or redirects do seem like a good idea, since the broader term is somewhat less familiar. Alai (talk) 02:11, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.