Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Hemanshu

;Suspected sock puppeteer

{{socklinks|1=Hemanshu}}

;Suspected sock puppets

• {{socklinks|1=Wikipedianforever }}

;Report submission by

• — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

;Evidence

• [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxygene&diff=prev&oldid=261585699] (reverting my reversion of Hemanshu's [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxygene&diff=prev&oldid=261089901]
• [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2009&diff=prev&oldid=261586211] (random month combinations in {{la|2009}})
• [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2010&diff=prev&oldid=261588717] (random month combinations in {{la|2010}})
• [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2011&diff=prev&oldid=261589042] (random month combinations in {{la|2011}})
• remaining edits include complete removal of month tags in 2013–2022, which I tend to agree with, even though some of the tags are specially linked from the headers.
• Hemanshu's similar edits in {{la|2012}} include [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2012&diff=243894194&oldid=243146586 8 October], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2012&diff=248026619&oldid=247985190 27 October], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2012&diff=next&oldid=248098824 28 October], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2012&diff=next&oldid=248126038 28 October], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2012&diff=next&oldid=248141893 28 October], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2012&diff=next&oldid=248175825 28 October], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2012&diff=next&oldid=248363450 October 30], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2012&diff=next&oldid=248549524 October 30], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2012&diff=260820727&oldid=260680375 30 December], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2012&diff=next&oldid=260907187 30 December].

;Comments

• Hemanshu is now blocked for edit warring on 2012

• WF's first edits were to his monobook, which is now identical to Hemanshu's. Suggest CU, though it admittedly looks pretty obvious to me. Wizardman 18:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

• I agree that a block might be considered on this evidence, but since the case is before Arbcom, a CU should be run. The CUs may decline to do a check if Wikipedianforever is already blocked. See my submission at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hemanshu. In any case, I think the behavioral evidence here is not good enough for an indef. EdJohnston (talk) 19:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

:: {{confirmed}} both behaviorally and by checkuser data. There is also what appears to be a lot of other suspect activity as well, which may or may not be connected - I'm discussing this with Coren. FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 19:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

;Conclusions

• Hemanshu has been desysopped by Dungodung by request of the ArbCom pending resolution of an ArbCom motion [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=261745852#Temporary_emergency_desysop_of_User:Hemanshu]. Stifle (talk) 20:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
• He has also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hemanshu&diff=261226873&oldid=261225413 requested RTV]. Stifle (talk) 20:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
• He didn't ask for RTV, he asked for his account to be deleted, which is a technical impossibility. — Rlevse • Talk • 03:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

----