Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Robertomalancini
=[[User:Robertomalancini]]=
;Suspected sockpuppeteer
{{user5|1=Robertomalancini}}
;Suspected sockpuppets
{{user5|1=Roberto ludendorff}}
;Report submission by
Kelvinc 08:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
;Evidence
Accounts were created within 24 hours of each other: Robertomalancini at 21:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC) and Roberto ludendorff at 19:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC). Both accounts dove right into the Talk:Brazil page, arguing that current page does not accurately depict the Brazilian economy. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brazil&diff=prev&oldid=118449051 Robertomalancini's first edit] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brazil&diff=prev&oldid=118680249 Roberto ludendorff's first edit] less than 24 hours later. Robertomalancini then gives a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brazil&diff=prev&oldid=118898850 supporting reply], even saying that "
Their signatures are also similar, with a Wikilink to their user pages (non yet created) followed by their names again. See above links, as well as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brazil&diff=prev&oldid=118975723], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brazil&diff=prev&oldid=119176217]
Both Robertos, I suspect, are sockpuppets of another user or an unregistered IP, but it is not clear who that person would be (although I suppose a first registration cannot be truly called "sockpuppetry"). There was a previous conversation of a similar vein [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brazil&oldid=119017070#Too_beautiful_to_be_true], with two IPs that spoke of a similar position: 201.27.181.198 and 201.78.18.221. However, the IPs are from different ISPs (see [http://www.lacnic.net/cgi-bin/lacnic/whois?lg=EN&query=201.27.181.198], [http://www.lacnic.net/cgi-bin/lacnic/whois?lg=EN&query=201.78.18.221]). Therefore I am only raising attention to these two possible sockpuppets for now.
;Comments
;Conclusions
- Maybe they're the same person, but I see no evidence of policy violation. Closing with no action. --Akhilleus (talk) 02:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
----