Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Verdict (2nd)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the {{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{{nosubst. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

===User:Verdict===

;Suspected sockpuppeteer

;Suspected sockpuppets

;Report submission by:

↪Lakes (Talk) 12:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

;Evidence

Candyproof's edits continue the same antics that the previous sockpuppets do (see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Verdict for past incidents). ↪Lakes (Talk) 12:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

;Comments

Added Damon88 to the list. The constant edits related to Brock Lesnar along with a request for unprotection on that article goes along with the previous antics described in the first report. -- oakster TALK 22:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

:Damon88 also removed Paulley's response to my talk page about himself [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALakes&diff=109299848&oldid=109186243]. ↪Lakes (Talk) 20:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Please note: This user has now taken to creating accounts and then waiting for a number of days in order to get around semi-protection on some of the pages he wishes to edit. For this reason, there are undoubtedly many more accounts created by this user waiting for the five days to pass. --Yamla 17:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

:WP:RCU might be a way to track down those sleeper accounts. --Akhilleus (talk) 18:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

;Conclusions

All named accounts have been indef blocked; closing. --Akhilleus (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

----