Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Vml132f

=[[User:Vml132f]]=

;Suspected sockpuppeteer

{{user5|1=Vml132f}}

;Suspected sockpuppets

{{user5|1=203.136.20.106}}

{{user5|1=222.2.109.84}}

{{user5|1=58.85.113.212}}

{{user5|1=61.210.161.91}}

{{user5|1=DDRG}}

;Report submission by

Mackan 12:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

;Evidence

  • Revision as of 15:39, 20 April 2007: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joji_Obara&diff=124365665&oldid=124365560 the RV that got Vmlf123 banned]
  • Revision as of 05:35, 21 April 2007: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joji_Obara&diff=124538411&oldid=124527075 222.2.109.84]
  • Revision as of 08:16, 21 April 2007: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joji_Obara&diff=124557259&oldid=124538411]
  • Revision as of 08:45, 21 April 2007: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joji_Obara&diff=124560325&oldid=124559481]
  • Revision as of 09:58, 21 April 2007: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joji_Obara&diff=124567854&oldid=124562721]
  • Revision as of 13:22, 21 April 2007: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joji_Obara&diff=124590398&oldid=124588327] by User:DDRG

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AVml132f&diff=124463313&oldid=124376748] Vml132f was blocked for violating the 3RR on the Joji Obara article. Before his block, but after I had reverted his changes, he posted about it on this 2ch (Japanese BBS) thread [http://society6.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/korea/1174096535/] (a thread called "Let's make resistance against the Korean's forgery on Wikipedia", whose only purpose is canvassing Wikipedia articles), saying "Mackan is going crazy on the Joji Obara article again". The reverts continued, now carried out by anonymous users, and User:DDRG. While this is probably largely meatpuppetry, this Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Vml132f showed that while two of the IP's were unlikely to belong to Vmlf, one was "possible". Even if all of them aren't sockpuppets, it seems apparent that they all are single-purpose accounts and meatpuppets. And of course, Vml132f has possibly been using an anonymous IP to avoid a 3RR block. Mackan 12:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

;Comments

;Conclusions

  • Inconclusive. The named accounts seem like single-purpose accounts and have both been blocked for edit warring, but I don't see enough here to call for an additional block. --Akhilleus (talk) 15:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

----