Wikipedia:Teahouse#Hello! I gonna try a little help for my Research survey

I suppose that this has most likely been brought up before, but why do only 3 roblox games have Wikipedia articles? So many of these games should be notable for setting records or having controversy.

Lets give an example for the setting records part, Grow a Garden just hit 6.5 million players playing the game at once. The update is only an hour away. That has to be the most CCU of any video game of all time. Why does Grow a Garden not have a Wikipedia article yet?

For the controversy part of this argument, Pet Simulator has been known for being basically child gambling, NFT scandals, creating brand new marketing strategies used in other games, and having some of the most addictive gameplay ever. (and to top it off, a McDonalds promotion.)

The fact that Galarian Corsola has an article but Roblox games that have done some insane stuff (for better or for worse) don’t have articles is kinda crazy to me. Toketaa^talk 13:29, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hello @Toketaa. Notability on Wikipedia can be a strange concept. Factors like player counts don't contribute to notability. What does matter are secondary sources providing in-depth information on the subject. Without these sources, no such article can be published, because there would be no verifiable information to create an encyclopedic article.

:You can try finding these sources yourself if you wish. There's always a chance the article hasn't been created because simply no one wanted to create it yet. Good luck. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 14:05, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:I just created the article for Grow a Garden as there was sufficient coverage of the game in reliable sources. Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:43, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:To give an example of what the other users have said, The Henry Stickmin Collection has no (English) Wikipedia article despite being very popular. If it receives enough coverage one day I might create the article as I quite like the series, but I don't think that's the case yet. Popularity does not confer notability for Wikipedia's purposes. Have a nice day :) –The Sophocrat (talk) 03:43, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

::On a related note, WP:BFDI. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 12:32, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Add ROBLOX Frosaken GinoFCHq (talk) 16:24, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:Sources? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 16:26, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

::Forsaken ROBLOX GinoFCHq (talk) 17:07, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Sources? (We're not citing the experience itself.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 17:16, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:Welcome to the Teahouse. FORSAKEN has to meet WP:NVIDEOGAME to have an article on Wikipedia. ^EF⁵ 16:26, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

In my first task as an editor, Wikipedia gave me the challenge to find a citation in an article about Katyusha rocket launchers. (Katyusha rocket launcher)

While looking for the information, I came across two other sites and nearly cited them until I realized the text of the articles were 100% identical to the Wikipedia entry: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33152# and https://handwiki.org/wiki/Engineering:Katyusha_rocket_launcher

What is Wikipedia's policy on authors publishing an identical article on other online encyclopedias? Inquisit345 (talk) 19:22, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

: See WP:REUSE. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:28, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks for your response Andy. I'm not sure what the bottom line is though. WP:REUSE appears to be a discussion about how text and images copied from Wikipedia should be referenced, but is it possible the author of Katyusha rocket launcher created his Wikipedia article as a copy of text and images from one of the other two encyclopedias instead of the other way around? Inquisit345 (talk) 18:26, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Working that out usually involves some detective work, {{u|Inquisit345}}. It [https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Engineering:Katyusha_rocket_launcher&action=info seems that] the version on HandWiki.org was created on 7 February 2024, and checking the revision history of Katyusha rocket launcher, the text was already in the article before that date, so it seems that it was copied from our article, not to it. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:36, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::::In fact, it seems the version of the article that was copied from was the one that existed prior to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Katyusha_rocket_launcher&diff=prev&oldid=1198018439 this edit], when it had the longer "Post-war development" section that you see on HandWiki.org. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:41, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::@Cordless Larry. Very observant. Thanks for following up. One really has to go over the articles with a fine-toothed comb to figure something like that out. I have to wonder how common this kind of thing is... and if what if anything is done about it. Inquisit345 (talk) 13:44, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::Handwiki.org is a copy of Wikipedia that was started by someone who had articles they had written on Wikipedia deleted - they started their own site where their articles would remain. Everything you will find there is a copy of something that started here. MrOllie (talk) 13:49, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I am a published book editor that wants a Wikipedia page, not to self promote simply to establish facts. How do I go about that Claroconcaro (talk) 02:25, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:You don't. You're better off waiting for someone else with the sources to support it to write an article about you. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 02:34, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you for replying. May articles have been written about me, independent sources. They just don’t do it in Wikipedia. They have done it in magazines etc but not here. So what can I do about that? Claroconcaro (talk) 02:37, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Writing your own autobiography is "strongly discouraged", but not entirely impossible. You can try to write a draft and submit it to WP:AFC with the proper sourcing and writing that all articles require, but keep in mind that trying this will certainly bring many inherent obstacles. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 02:42, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::::So who can I ask to write it for me? What is the process? Claroconcaro (talk) 03:22, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::I'd reccomend waiting for someone else to write about you. They would create a draft. submit it to AFC, and a reviewer would check if it meets the standards of publication. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 03:24, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::Thanks! Claroconcaro (talk) 04:58, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

If you have edited published pieces you should be familiar with publishers’ guidelines. Think of Wikipedia as an online publisher, and you must follow Wikipedia’s rules on suitable articles. Help:Your first article tells you the basic guidelines to follow. Help:Referencing for beginners tells you what is and isn’t a suitable reference. You can’t start out by saying that you know what schools you attended, and what notable people you’ve worked with, so you can just write what you know. You need to find published sources that state these facts, so that others can track down those sources to double check what you’re writing about.

I would strongly recommend you read Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing. If you (or someone else) writes an article about you that gets accepted by Wikipedia that article won’t belong to you. Others can edit the article, and add published information, criticisms or reviews that you’d prefer not to have included in the article. And if the time comes when you decide that you’d prefer that article to go away, you can’t delete it. It is part of the Wikipedia encyclopedia, and it might get copied and shared on other websites.

Best wishes on any Wikipedia projects you chose to work on. Karenthewriter (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you for your reply! Are there writers that if you provide the information would want to publish an article about you, meaning if they believe it’s a contribution to society and find it interested to do so? Claroconcaro (talk) 04:58, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::Unfortunately, yes, but don't pay them See WP:SCAM. Shantavira|^{feed me} 08:42, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::Hello, @Claroconcaro, and welcome to the Teahouse. You say "not for promotion", but what you are trying to do is precisely promotion, as Wikipedia undestands the term. ColinFine (talk) 09:38, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Thank you for your reply. The reason I want to have a reliable autobiography it is because since I write and advice about finances, I get a lot of impostors, I don’t charge for financial advice, all of my advice is given for free and except for the book (that it is actually not mine, it’s the publishing house) there is nothing for sale on my end. What I would like written it’s financial concepts to help people out of their financial hole for free. Many articles have been written about me and the extra promotion is not what I am going for, it is simply to have the right info in a reliable source like Wikipedia. Claroconcaro (talk) 16:51, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::@Claroconcaro You have been shy in telling us your full name, which would help experienced editors judge whether there were sufficient sources to establish you notability as Wikipedia defines that term. You can see whether many exist [https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=007734830908295939403:galkqgoksq0#gsc.tab=0 by searching at this URL]. Put your first/last name between inverted commas (i.e. "First Last") and with luck there will be some. Then read all the other links you have been provided with and this essay. Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:01, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Not shy at all to share my name, my full name is “Carolina Hernandez” my published book is “Una guía millonaria” right now the book is published in Spanish and sold in over 50 countries but it is in the process of being published in English.

:::All the independent sources that have wrote about it, or tv shows, blogs, interviews etc that have talk about it are in Spanish, I am just preparing for when the information is also in English, to prevent the wrong information to be the one published. Claroconcaro (talk) 16:58, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::::Unfortunately, as you may have found when you tried the link I provided, your name is the same as several other people, so that way of finding sources doesn't work well. You might be better to start by creating a draft for the Spanish-language version of Wikipedia. However, I don't know their requirements for sources to demonstrate wikinotability. Mike Turnbull (talk) 17:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::Thanks Michael, that’s the thing, I meet the criteria under Creative professionals based on wikinotability, and what I am trying to do since I have a very common name is to separate myself from that, I know the independent sources’ links. Right now unless someone writes “Carolina Hernandez Una guía millonaria” too many Carolina’s show up. The guidelines in Spanish are pretty much the same but the community is not as active, hence me asking here. I truly appreciate your replies! Claroconcaro (talk) 19:23, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:Another bit of advice: There are other places to promote/tell the world about yourself--your personal blog/site, social accounts, About.me/Carrd.co...the list goes on. Other than that, you already have the option to create a user page--which can only be used to state your goals/interests as a Wikipedian. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 12:44, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Teahouse,

I recently submitted a draft article on Jeff Campbell (Apostle), and it was declined by ToadetteEdit due to concerns about notability and the lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. I really appreciate the review, and I’m hoping to get clarification on how to improve the draft for resubmission.

The draft is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sadiowiki/sandbox

I’ve cited sources including La Voz, The Denver Post, Longmont Daily Times-Call, HuffPost, Westword, and award acknowledgments from the Bonfils-Stanton Foundation and Denver Arts & Venues. Some are in-depth features, while others cover public events or cultural contributions.

Could someone advise whether any of these sources already meet notability criteria if formatted correctly with inline tags? And if not, what types of additional coverage should I be looking to include?

Any guidance on strengthening the article for acceptance would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you!

—Sadiowiki Sadiowiki (talk) 07:01, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Sadiowiki According to our policy on biographies of living people, all facts likely to be challenged must be cited to reliable sources. At present, in the "Early life" section you have put all the cites at the end (including a duplicated one), so it is unclear which back up the first paragraph, if any. The section on "Legacy and vision" is entirely uncited. Who said that about him? You? You also need to think which sources show how he is wikinotable and perhaps mention the three best ones in a comment on a draft to help the reviewer. Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:51, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you for your detailed feedback — I’ve made several updates based on your suggestions:

::- All duplicate citations (like Migoya’s) have been consolidated using `name="..."` formatting to avoid redundancy.

::- I marked uncited statements such as the Forensics League achievements with `{{citation needed}}`.

::- I added inline `` tags directly after each verifiable fact in the “Early Life” section to clarify sourcing.

::- The “Legacy and Vision” section is now cited with reliable sources from *Westword* (2013 in-depth interview) and *Denver Arts & Venues* (2024 award recognition), and rewritten in a neutral tone with attribution where applicable.

::For notability, the three strongest sources currently cited are:

::1. *Westword* feature on Jeff Campbell’s one-man show (2013)

::2. *Denver Arts & Venues* — Social Impact Artist Award (2024)

::3. *HuffPost* articles on his music and activism (2009)

::Here’s the current draft for your reference:

::👉 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sadiowiki/sandbox](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sadiowiki/sandbox)

::I’d appreciate any further advice on how to strengthen the draft for acceptance. Thanks again! Sadiowiki (talk) 18:01, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

I need to change my email, that one is no longer active. Robert0259 (talk) 07:46, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{reply|Robert0259}} To change your email, you can go to your user preferences and scroll down until you the email options heading and there is an option to change or remove your email address. cyberdog958^Talk 07:50, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

If someone makes an undue personal attack against you on an admin noticeboard (e.g. ANI, AN3, etc.), are you supposed to revert/undo it? If not, what else should you do if you don't think the person is acting in good faith towards you? »Gommeh 14:15, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hello @Gommeh. Yes, you can revert the user's edit per the policy at WP:RPA. You should also leave a polite message on their talk page if you feel that is necessary. PhoenixCaelestis (Talk · Contributions) 14:22, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I've noticed that a new user is adding links that point to https://backlinkspro.net/, leading to what looks like a sales page, with no information on the subject of the link. For example, in an article on marketing:

[https://backlinkspro.net/ Marketing strategy]

I think this is vandalism (or something else undesirable) but I'm not sure. Would appreciate input. FictionWitch (talk) 16:02, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:This is absolutely inappropriate linking and considering the link is completely irrelevent to the articles, I would consider it to be vandalism. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 16:09, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you! Would you warn the user or wait to see if they add more? FictionWitch (talk) 16:10, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Warn the user immediately if nobody else has done so (see the editor's talk page). On a first offense, try the template {{tl|uw-vandalism1}} or {{tl|uw-spam1}} if the editor is adding spam links. If it keeps happening, you can escalate the warnings {{tl|uw-spam2}} etc. After 3 warnings are ignored, it's enough to report at WP:AIV for administrator attention. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:13, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:::I reported the account as a vandalism account. They've made two edits in total and both were adding this link erroneously. Good catch! S1mply.dogmom (talk) 16:14, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::::Thank you both for prompt responses. FictionWitch (talk) 16:15, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::::I posted my comment before seeing this. My apologies. Did I act too quickly? S1mply.dogmom (talk) 16:15, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::No, you did fine. The account is now indef-blocked for using Wikipedia for promotional purposes. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:17, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:In future, you can report such egregious spamming to WP:AIV. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::Twinkle is also helpful if you're confident enough. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 16:27, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

A user moved Ontario Health (agency) to Ontario Health without discussion. I reverted it. The user reverted my reversion, without discussion. If I move the page back, I'd be WP:move warring. What is the proper process for me to take to revert the page back to its original name without move warring? Legend of 14 (talk) 18:31, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:Looking over the article and talk pages, there appears to be no attempt at opening a discussion by either party. It would be a good idea at this point, before doing any further reverts, to open the discussion yourself. You can ping them on the article's talk page or make a note on their user talk page. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 18:53, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::I did make a note on their user page under the existing May 2025 section. Legend of 14 (talk) 18:55, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:::I'm trying to figure out who added the descriptive disambiguator (agency) in the first place. As a new article it was reviewed in 2021 as Ontario Health. So far as I can see, there's zero reason for disambiguation since there are no article conflicts which are apparent. We don't commonly add a disambiguator unless one is necessary. BusterD (talk) 19:05, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Precisely. The person performing the move is not a novice contributor . Assume good faith and give time for a response. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 19:17, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:Why did you revert it? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:13, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::There are other pages that Ontario Health could refer to like Ontario Health Insurance Plan, Public Health Ontario, and Ministry of Health (Ontario). The disambiguator helped differentiate the article from those pages in search. Legend of 14 (talk) 19:16, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

i may be slow but how do you make an article Conesfortheworld (talk) 19:21, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hi @Conesfortheworld, I've left a welcome message on your talk page with some links. Help:Your first article might be of use? Knitsey (talk) 19:25, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hello, @Conesfortheworld, and welcome to the Teahouse, and to Wikipedia. {{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} ColinFine (talk) 21:40, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

I have been trying to post an article about Dr. Alexander Meystel (deceased), a world-renowned roboticist and foundational researcher in the fields of control systems, machine learning/machine intelligence and robotics. Nothing too dissimilar from his colleage James Albus, who already has an article on Wikipedia.

The only difference, I guess, is that I happen to be his son (only child, now ... ahem ... we'll call me .. "old"), and there is no one else left to speak for him or his lasting legacy on the fields I mentioned (his works are still being taught around the world, referenced in patents and papers, etc.

It is very burdensome to go through this process thrice++. Can someone please help me? Thank you.

Michael Meystel Meystel (talk) 20:07, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hello! Getting an article approved for submission can often times be a slow and frustrating process. I would recommend going through the notes on your talk page. Each time a submission is denied, they will list out any reasons why. You are also given tools to seek assistance either from the reviewing contributor or other sources available to new contributors. The Tea House is certainly a good place to start, but WP: Articles for creation Help desk may be more specialized for what you're asking. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 20:56, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hello, @Meystel, and welcome to the Teahouse.

:A Wikipedia article should be a neutral summary of what several people wholly unconnected with the subject have chosen to publish about him in reliable publications, and very little else.

:While your COI does not prevent you from creating and submitting a draft (and thank you for disclosing it), it may make it harder for you to write an acceptable article, because you may find it difficult to forget every single thing you know about him and write a summary only of what those independent sources say.

:(I'm overstating the case slightly: your knowledge about him is absolutely inadmissable, except where it is corroborated by reliable published sources; but non-independent published sources may be cited in limited ways - see WP:SPS. But such information will not contribute to establishing notability, and so may as well be omitted until the draft has been accepted). ColinFine (talk) 21:47, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

About two months ago, my GA nomination of Equality was picked up, but since then, the reviewer has been periodically disappearing. I believe them when they say they are trying to make time for it, but given their reasons for disappearing, I'm beginning to think it would be better for everyone involved to let them off the hook. I'm not sure what to do. – Farkle Griffen (talk) 20:24, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:I think formally speaking you're probably allowed to withdraw the nomination. Not sure how to change the templates/notices to account for that, but the person reviewing your article might know. Just say you'd like to withdraw the nomination. If no one is actively nominating it, the review must end, formally. Mrfoogles (talk) 03:36, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:Interesting to see a GA nomination for a topic as fundamental as Equality, though. Don't see those a lot. Mrfoogles (talk) 03:37, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello. First of all sorry for my English. I am currently writing my thesis on this subject, and I have trouble switching to a different style than my usual one, so I can't improve the subject myself out of fear of being wrongly accused of plagiarism (or of simply using Wikipedia instead of doing my own research on current academic consensus). However, I can provide the necessary sources for the improvement of pages relating to the Muisca confederation: All of them are publicly accessible and I hope a devoted editor has the time and energy to read them, and then to change the Wikipedia page(s) on the Muisca for the better. Indeed, there have been many changes in Muisca scholarship recently (this does not mean that the traditional historical narratives are necessarily wrong). Here are the sources, they will contextualise everything and are fairly easy to read: https://www.banrepcultural.org/biblioteca-virtual/credencial-historia/numero-44/los-senores-muiscas (for this link you will have to refuse options for it to work); https://www.academia.edu/22398553/Mercados_poblamiento_Muiscas ; and https://sites.pitt.edu/~ccapubs/pdfdownloads/PITTmem09-Langebaek_1995.pdf (the last one will take some time loading). I know this demand might be bizarre, but it comes from the heart. It hurts seeing niche subjects cite almost only short museum pages/blogs/tourism pages instead of the detailed studies that exist about the muisca just as they do about the Aztec and Inca. I don’t have much time to argue about it a lot, and as I said I am not able to do the changes (big) myself (though believe me, I would love to, and I will probably one day). If a devoted user speaking basic Spanish and English with the time and energy necessary would have the kindness to read the three sources, I will be eternally grateful. There is MUCH more to this than 2 studies and a short article, but this can be a good way to improve Wikipedia by being informed about the muisca. After having finished, I am sure the editor in question will have the exact same eagerness as I have to improve Wikipedia pages related to the muisca. Maybe other editors with knowledge of niche subjects know what I am talking about. Kind regards, 80.187.115.196 (talk) 22:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:You may wish to bring this up on the article's talk page and the talk pages of the related Wikiprojects. The ones for Colombia and Indigenous peoples of the Americas may be particularly interested as the article is ranked top and high importance in those Wikiprojects respectively. PhoenixCaelestis (Talk · Contributions) 23:25, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks for the link! I will re-post my original message there then. Regards, 80.187.115.196 (talk) 05:05, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

I've been working on an article for quite a bit of time now and want to nominate it for good article status soon, but I was wondering if there was an alternative to peer reviewing to get a bit of feedback. I'm not looking for an in-depth review like the peer review option would give me, but just a bit of constructive criticism on what I can improve before submitting a nomination. I've been doing alright improving the article based on its previous good article nomination + the various pages with tips and tricks, but I've never nominated an article before and I'm really not 100% on if I should do it now. Is there anything like that on Wikipedia? I've spent quite a bit of time looking, but found nothing (though, I am a bit new here)

Thank you! Reverosie (talk) 23:12, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:I don't think there's an explicit alternative. You may want to ask on the talk pages of the related Wikiprojects for the article. PhoenixCaelestis (Talk · Contributions) 23:27, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::I already asked on the article's talk page itself, but I'll probably ask at the respective wikiproject too. Thank you! Reverosie (talk) 23:30, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Talk pages are pretty dead unless it's for something like a country, major war, or famous person. Might save you a bit of time in the future. PhoenixCaelestis (Talk · Contributions) 23:33, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::::Yeah, I just went looking, and the talk page for middle ages (where my article best applies) is abandoned to say the least. I'm not sure where to go from here and might even submit the article as a nomination tomorrow regardless since I've spent quite a lot of time at it. (though, I'm not sure how to do that either!) Waiting for a peer review would be useless at this stage since I had the article's failed GA nomination to guide me. Reverosie (talk) 23:41, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello!

I'm so sorry to ask another question so soon after the previous one, but it's unrelated: My account is now over 4 days old and has nearly 300 edits, so can I move my submitted draft into the article mainspace? If so, how? If not, can I delete my draft and re-create it as a new article that won't need a review? or do articles still need reviews even from verified accounts?

Thank you! Reverosie (talk) 23:16, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:Your account should be autoconfirmed, and thus you should be able to move a page. There should be a blue "Move" button on the right ToC just under the header "Tools". If you feel the article meets notability guidelines, then by all means you are permitted to move it into mainspace. Be warned that it may be moved back to draftspace if another editor feels it is not ready. PhoenixCaelestis (Talk · Contributions) 23:31, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you so much! The article is moved :) Reverosie (talk) 23:46, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:::@Reverosie Interesting article. Just one minor point: in Sibylla (wife of Bohemond III)#Marriage and conflict you seem to have an excessive number of "would"s. Why not just use the past tense of the relevant verbs? Mike Turnbull (talk) 13:26, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::::Thank you so much for pointing this out! I've edited the article and fixed this problem Reverosie (talk) 15:15, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hey guys, thanks for your support. I need a hand with Draft:Paulo Otto. Anybody could help me in the way to publish it? Allyssonallan (talk) 00:39, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:The reviewer gave feedback as to why the draft was declined - you have not shown notability with reliable, secondary sources. Every source you have used was partially written by the subject of the article. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks for your support @Notcharizard This Professor is low-profile and it is difficult to find his awards elsewhere. Allyssonallan (talk) 13:19, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::: Since he was a professor, it is possible that his notability can be based on WP:NPROF. The usual options are either that his publications are highly-cited and impactful (relative to the standards of his field), or that his professorship was the equivalent of a named or distinguished professorship. AfC reviewers are often completely unaware of NPROF, which is an extremely unusual deviation from the sourcing requirements of Wikipedia generally, so you may need to draw their attention to it. Elemimele (talk) 16:21, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

I made an edit request at the Samaria article, can someone respond to it Emukettu (talk) 03:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Emukettu: You need to have patience. Please see this. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 03:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Can a television advertisement be used a source for dating a products availability to a decade when you can not find the exact release date of a product Sharnadd (talk) 04:20, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hello, @Sharnadd, and welcome to the Teahouse. I don't think this would be acceptable: in my view it would be original research. ColinFine (talk) 09:37, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Sharnadd Wikipedians can be remarkably good at finding sources if you give them key pieces of information. So, you could mention that you want to get an approximate date by posting on the talk page of the article, if it has lots of watchers, or maybe in one of the WP:Reference desks. One possibility would be to find a published newspaper advert for the product and cite that as a date it was certainly available. Mike Turnbull (talk) 13:19, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::great advise will do that thanks sure it must be out there somewhere Sharnadd (talk) 16:05, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

{{collapse top|Article draft}}

Thug Life - Reel and Real

A Life Lesson for ever .........

Thug Life - Is it a tattoo - a meme or a Rebellion pose??

Is it waking up every day, staring failure in the face and saying — “Not today, da.”

Now let’s talk the reel and real Thug Life.

But the present version - ageing like our Amma's filter coffee and still tasty.

🎬 Kamal Haasan. Mani Ratnam. A.R. Rahman. Simbu.

4 men.

4 different battles.

1 loud message: “We’re still here. And we’re not done.”

After a big setback with Netizens almost trolling him to the core - a never before for Indian 2- Kamal Haasan at 70, walks into Thug Life

not like a man trying to prove something but confident of doing a new thing irrespective of anything.

And Mani Ratnam? He’s nearing 70 too.

He made a 30-year-old Kamal play a 60-year-old don in Nayakan. Now? He’s flipped the script. Making the same Kamal act like he’s 30 — with fire in his eyes and rebellion in his walk.

That is Thug Life - I feel.

It’s not about pretending to be young.

It’s about refusing to grow old inside.

🎶 Then comes Rahman.

Nearing 60 soon, still creating music like he’s got something to prove. He doesn't rest on Grammys. He reinvents. Every. Single. Time.

Thug Life?

It’s the beat that keeps playing even when the world hits pause.

🔥 And Simbu.

Written off. Doubted. Questioned. But Mani Ratnam didn’t just cast him. He trusted him when others didn’t. That trust? Simbu’s paying it back with every frame.

இனிமேல் நான் தான் Rangaraya Sakthivel Naickan. (Here after Iam - Rangaraya Sakthivel Naickan) - Simbu Roaring like a Lion in the Teaser

He’s acting, roaring and also

thanking in Audio Launch. That’s real thug gratitude.

So what is Thug Life?

Is it the life you flex on Instagram.

Is it the life you fight for when no one's watching.

It is Kamal screaming “action” at 70.

Mani rewriting rules at 69.

Rahman composing thunder at 59.

Simbu proving doubters wrong at 42

They didn’t drop a film. They dropped a message:

THUG LIFE

Don’t let your age, your past, your critics—or your own fear—decide when your story ends.

Because legends? They don’t age. They evolve.

If they’re living their Thug Life at 60's and and 70s

Why not you - Most happy to hear your thug life moments - irrespective of your age . VS Balajee (talk) 07:58, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

{{Cob}}

:This is an encyclopedia, VS Balajee. Please read a number of the very many articles that it already includes: doing so should give you an understanding of what an encyclopedia is. -- Hoary (talk) 08:09, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

I tried adding an atlas to the Halfmoon Township, Pennsylvania page but it won't go in the history section for some reason. Could someone explain why this the case and help me fix it. Thanks!!! Goonsnick (talk) 09:25, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:It appears to show in the history segment on mobile. The infobox may be forcing it down and thus out of the history section of the article. You can go into advanced image setting and move the image to the left side so it appears in history on a computer. PhoenixCaelestis (Talk · Contributions) 10:38, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:It's an effect of standard layout process, where an image cannot be displayed higher than the population-box because the population-box is higher than the image in the page's source. DMacks (talk) 14:11, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

I would like to create a new Wikipedia article for a company. Can anyone please tell me what kind of rules and regulations have to be kept in mind? Especially in regards to copyright infringement/violation and disclosing my identity as working for the company.

Please note that the new page will be written from a neutral point of view, citing proper sources of information. 167.103.2.169 (talk) 09:40, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:Probably a good idea to read WP:BOSS first and then WP:YFA. Creating an article is the most difficult task there is here, creating one with a conflict of interest and zero experience is ten times harder. Theroadislong (talk) 09:50, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::You also appear to be evading a block on User talk:Sunehagh. Theroadislong (talk) 10:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Greetings, dear Wikipedians! This is my first question in the teahouse. I'd like to share a question about changing your username on Wikipedia.

Imagine you feel bored and you want to change your username on Wikipedia because of some random reason, is it possible to do so? Or is it not possible and you cannot change your username anymore?

Thanks for awnsering my question!

EpicSalmon (talk) 11:32, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:@EpicSalmon It is possible, please see WP:CHUS. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 11:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:I have an idea that I think is better, EpicSalmon. Allay your boredom by contributing reliably sourced, referenced material to one or two of en:Wikipedia's existing articles. (This is something that you don't seem to have attempted for seven months.) -- Hoary (talk) 12:21, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::Wikipedia readers, let alone occasional or irregular contributors, are welcome to create accounts—it allows them to use gadgets and user-defined styles, for example.

::They are also welcome to change user name, should they wish to.

::You should not address any Wikipedia user in that fashion; much less so on The Teahouse, which is intended to be a welcoming environment for the less experienced. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:48, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::Attitudes like this probably explain why some people don't contribute 🤔 —Matrix(!) _{ping one}^{when replying} {u - t? - _uselessc} 13:06, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

To Whom It May Concern,

Previosuly, a Wikipedia page with my name was available in English but no longer publicly accessible. I would kindly like to ask for your advice or help in restoring or recreating an English-language Wikipedia page that meets the notability criteria.

I am a senior expert in GenAI, AI&Society, tech foresight /policy with international recognition. I am an Associate Professor, a transatlantic Horizon Europe Research Project Leader, an invited expert for the UN, EU, and several leading academic and policy organizations, and a Fulbright alumna. I am the first who published a comprehensive summary/monograph of GenAI, Media and Society by Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group as the founder of AI Media Research - global hub, beyond several D1-Q1 publications in the emerging AI trends and strategic foresight.

If helpful, I am happy to collect and provide verified sources (academic publications, policy contributions, international media mentions, Google Scholar, ORCID etc.) to support the article’s credibility.

Would it be possible to be connected with a volunteer editor who could help review or re-upload my article? Thank you in advance for any support you can offer.

I’m highly motivated to contribute, as I recently participated in a Ringier–Hungarian Wikimedia event aimed at improving the underrepresentation of women on Wikipedia, where I was encouraged to connect with a volunteer editor to collaboratively work on an English-language article.

Thank you for your collaboration in advance,

Katalin Feher PhD Zenefuleimnek (talk) 13:20, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:The article was Katalin Fehér and was deleted after discussion in June 2022 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katalin Fehér. You may request it be undeleted and moved to "Draft:" space, where you can work on it to show that you now meet the criteria listed at WP:SCHOLAR. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:41, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Zenefuleimnek On the English Wikipedia we use a set of possible notability requirements for academics, listed at WP:NACADEMIC. Which of these criteria do you think you may meet? Your Hungarian article is far too much like a resumé and entirely unsuitable here. Mike Turnbull (talk) 13:47, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::I expect Zenefuleimnek thinks "an invited expert for the UN, EU, and several leading academic and policy organizations" meets "The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity." Do you not? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:51, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello everyone, I was looking for the biggest building on Earth in terms of population : some sources were pointing to the Regent International Center, which had no Wikipedia article except in Chinese. I was enthusiastic about creating an article in English (although it is not my mother tongue). I marked it as a stub, knowing that the community would improve it after a while. But soon after I created it, it was deleted and replaced by a "Draft" : Draft:Regent International Center. I don't know how to improve it to pass this step, because of language problems (not so fluent in English, I am afraid) and the lack of sources others than tiktok videos and tabloids. If someone could help by editing this article, I would appreciate. Damouns (talk) 14:00, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Damouns I think the best way forward would be to include your references and a picture in the main article on Hangzhou. Please read this help page on how to format your two sources correctly. I don't think that it will be easy to demonstrate individual notability for the building, although we do allow Chinese-language sources if that's what are mainly available: see WP:NONENG. Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:10, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::The formatting of sources was not incorrect, albeit not optimal. I have improved them, before seeing your comment. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:58, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:You need more citations, from reliable sources, independent of the building's architects or owners, showing Significant coverage of the building. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:57, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

I would like to write an article about Bring Back Euro Trains, a campaign that was formed following the withdrawal of Eurostar international trains services from the Kent stations Ashford and Ebbsfleet, Kent, UK.

I believe this is notable because there is still a lot of misinformation about whether or not international trains are actually stopping at the stations that are labelled "international", that is to say: Stratford International, Ebbsfleet International, and Ashford International. The services were widthdrawn during the pandemic and were never reinstated, and many AI language tools that scrape the internet for information about these stations are misinformed. As a novice contributor, I would value someone's feedback on whether such an article would be valuable.

I am connected with Bring Back Euro Trains (as a volunteer) so I would like to write an article which could be edited by someone independent. Could someone advise me whether this would be the right approach?

The aim of this article would not be to criticise Eurostar in particular. Several competitors are vying to use the line and the organisation has a broad remit to inform as well as to campaign.

I hope someone can advise me on this.

StephanieChicken StephanieChicken (talk) 16:01, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:You would need to show that the organisation meets the criteria at WP:GNG.

:You could start an article at Draft:Bring Back Euro Trains, declare your CoI on your user page, and submit the draft when ready via the AfC process.

:Another option would be to ask on the talk pages of relevant articles, like High Speed 1 for someone to add a section to those articles. If and when there is enough material, it can be split off into a separate article. Again, you should declare your CoI.

:I have left some other, more general advice, on your talk page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:11, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you for your quick reply and for your welcome, much appreciated. The High Speed 1 page correctly (and very briefly) mentions the lack of Eurostar at Ashford and Ebbsfleet since the pandemic, but not the impact this has had on Kent and the wider south east. I doubt if London St Pancras High Speed (as the company is called now) would be interested in a section on this. I will try drafting something independent, declare my CoI, and see if I can work within the guidelines. StephanieChicken (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Hello, @StephanieChicken, and welcome to the Teahouse.

:::{{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}}

:::Your text above shows some misunderstandings about Wikipedia, (unsurprising in somebody who is new to it). You say "I believe this is notable because there is still a lot of misinformation..." - this is a complete non-sequitur. Notability is roughly about "is there enough wholly independent reliably published material about the subject to base an article on?" And whether or not "London St Pancras High Speed (as the company is called now) would be interested in a section on this" is 100% irrelevant to Wikipedia, because the company have absolutely no control or ownership of the Wikipedia article about them, any more than BBET would have any ownership or control of a Wikipedia article about them.

:::The fact that you have created an account and immediately started writing about a campaigning group suggests you are likely to fall foul of WP:NOTSOAPBOX. Please be aware that {{HD/WINI}} ColinFine (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::::Thank you ColinFine I really appreciate you taking the trouble to explain this. I realised almost as soon as I had pressed Send that companies have no ownership of articles about them, and therefore part of what I said was irrelevant! I understand the non-sequitur which you have explained well. Of course I am biased, but I also have experience of journalism and of writing from a neutral standpoint. But Wikipedia is a very particular environment which as you say I need to learn to navigate. So I will start by looking around at my subject of interest and see where I can add or correct information. Does that sound like a proper plan? StephanieChicken (talk) 20:10, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::Yes, it does, @StephanieChicken. But make sure that any information you add comes from reliable published sources, not solely from your own knowledge, however expert you may be. ColinFine (talk) 22:11, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

I am an independant film actor from bangladesh. I have lots of news references about my works. How can i publish my article in wiki. I have created an account today. Actor Farhan Khan Rio (talk) 17:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:You should declare a conflict of interest on your user page. You can find the information about declaring one here. PhoenixCaelestis (Talk · Contributions) 17:54, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hello, @Actor Farhan Khan Rio, and welcome to the Teahouse. You are very strongly discouraged from creating an article about yourself or your works (see WP:autobiography) but not forbidden.

:In order to write such an article successfully, you would need to

:# Find several places where people wholly unconnected with you, and unprompted by you, have chosen to publish material about you in reliable publications (without several such sources, no article is possible); and

:# Write a summary of what those sources say. What you know, believe, or think about yourself is irrelevant, and should not be mentioned in the article unless it is corroborated by independent sources.

:Do you see why this is difficult? ColinFine (talk) 18:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hey

I created this page: Draft:Special Operations Group (Estonia), should I release it or edit it more, as im not the best in everything yet. Keep in mind that I translated most of it, but I have some sources that I can use to improve it, but I would like to do that 1 step at a time after the page has been released. Minaolenkarl (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:The best way to get feedback on your draft is to press the blue button that says "Submit the draft for review!" that is located just above the start of the draft. I will note, just by a quick skim, that the sections "Formation" and "Activity" are completely unsourced - you need a source for each claim made in the article. I highly doubt the article would be accepted at this time, but you just need to find reliable sources that back your claims. Best of luck! PhoenixCaelestis (Talk · Contributions) 17:53, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::Hello, its nearly impossible to find sources for said topic, other than a book, that I have as well. Can I do anything about it? Minaolenkarl (talk) 18:01, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::You can cite the book, though if you cannot find a source for every claim then you cannot have the claim in the article. It may help if you see what sources your book used. PhoenixCaelestis (Talk · Contributions) 18:07, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Hello, @Minaolenkarl. To add to what PhoenixCaelestis says, you may cite the book if it was published by a reputable publisher. If it was self-published, or through a vanity press, it is unlikely to be regarded as a reliable source.

:::Note that the existing of an article in another language version of Wikipedia is no guarantee that the subject meets English Wikipedia's criteria for notability: each language version is an indpeendent project, with its own policies and procedures. ColinFine (talk) 18:58, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::::Hey, the publisher is reputable, as one of the authors is the unit commander himself, and the book is published by Rahva Raamat, one of Estonians biggest book stores/publishers. Though now im wondering if I can cite individual small talks, that i have had in real life? Minaolenkarl (talk) 19:00, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::What is the name / ISBN for the book? Peaceray (talk) 19:01, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::"Sog. Eesti eriüksuse lugu" Minaolenkarl (talk) 19:08, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::::Here is the footnote that I would recommend using:

::::::::{{cite book |last=Saksatamm |first=Markus |title=SOG: eesti eriüksuse lugu |trans-title=SOG: The story of the Estonian special forces unit |publisher=Rahva Raamat |publication-place=Tallinn |year=2021 |isbn=978-9916-14-017-8 |oclc=1301998812 |language=et}}

:::::::This should render in the footnote section as:

::::::::{{cite book |last=Saksatamm |first=Markus |title=SOG: eesti eriüksuse lugu |trans-title=SOG: The story of the Estonian special forces unit |publisher=Rahva Raamat |publication-place=Tallinn |year=2021 |isbn=978-9916-14-017-8 |oclc=1301998812 |language=et}}

:::::::If you are going to be using different pages as footnotes, then I recommend using shortened footnotes like so:

::::::::{{sfn|Saksatamm|2021|p=}} for a single page or {{sfn|Saksatamm|2021|pp=}}for multiple pages and

::::::::*{{cite book |last=Saksatamm |first=Markus |title=SOG: eesti eriüksuse lugu |trans-title=SOG: The story of the Estonian special forces unit |publisher=Rahva Raamat |publication-place=Tallinn |year=2021 |isbn=978-9916-14-017-8 |oclc=1301998812 |language=et}} for the full citation.

:::::::Peaceray (talk) 19:25, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::::If you are going to use shortened footnotes, I would put the full citation under a new ===Sources=== subheading under ==References==. Peaceray (talk) 19:33, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::::P.S. You use {{tl|sfn}} instead of tags. Peaceray (talk) 19:36, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::Hello again, @Minaolenkarl. If the book is published by a reputable publisher, that's great; but if it is coauthored by the commander of the unit, that's not so good.

:::::{{HD/WINI}}

:::::The article must be based almost entirely on independent sources, which does not include a book by the commander.

:::::And as for your personal communications, I'm afraid they cannot be used or cited in a Wikipedia article: verifiability is a core policy. ColinFine (talk) 22:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:I moved the page to Draft:Special Operations Group (Estonia) as there should always be a space before before a left parenthesis. I also did a number of edits to the draft that were improvements or indicated what needs to be done. Peaceray (talk) 19:00, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Does Wikipedia have a random article button that'll choose a random page in a dedicated section/category?

For example if I'm looking at marine animals is it possible to have it show me articles just about marine animals? 91.150.188.87 (talk) 18:40, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:See Special:RandomInCategory. Peaceray (talk) 19:03, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

I've been trying to fix citation problems (going through everything under Q in :Category:CS1_errors: periodical ignored sounded like fun), and I'm kind of stumped by Jose Maria Quijano Wallis. I'm not entirely sure what reference [2], the one currently with the error message, was supposed to point to. I think it might be a reference to a book, confused with a reference to a library's website, which is now a deadlink. If the original book was [https://archive.org/details/GranEnciclopediaDeColombiaTomo5CulturaCirculoDeLectores1996/page/n23/mode/2up this], which is my best guess, then the dates in the article don't agree with the dates in the source. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 19:19, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:The Wayback Machine is no help.

:The editor who added it hasn't edited since 2018; but you could try dropping them an email.

: You can contact Luis Ángel Arango Library via [https://www.banrepcultural.org/blaa].

:If you don't speak Spanish, you might ask at WT:WikiProject Spain or :es:Wikipedia:Embajada Local for someone to help you.

:The Spanish version of the article has the same issue. If you find the answer, please fix it there too, or notify :es:Wikipedia:Embajada Local. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:I fixed the problem with that second citation based on the Internet Archive link that you provided. The full citation now is:

:*{{cite book |last=Posada Carbó |first=Eduardo |chapter=Historia de las ideas en Colombia [History of ideas in Colombia] |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/GranEnciclopediaDeColombiaTomo5CulturaCirculoDeLectores1996/page/n15/mode/2up |editor-last=Melo |editor-first=Jorge Orlando |title=Gran enciclopedia de Colombia: tematica |trans-title=Great Encyclopedia of Colombia: Thematic |volume=5 Cultura [Culture] |publisher=Circulo de Lectores |publication-place=Santa Fé de Bogotá |year=1994 |isbn=978-958-28-0330-8 |oclc=164755392 |language=es |url=https://archive.org/details/GranEnciclopediaDeColombiaTomo5CulturaCirculoDeLectores1996 |page=[https://archive.org/details/GranEnciclopediaDeColombiaTomo5CulturaCirculoDeLectores1996/page/n23/mode/2up 24] |via=Internet Archive}}

:These two citations have the same ISBN & OCLC #. The OCLC is to another text unrelated, & the ISBN is for ESTUDIOS, DISCURSOS Y ESCRITOS VARIOS, DE J.M. QUIJANO WALLIS.

:* {{cite book |title=Estudios, discursos y escritos varios |trans-title=Studies, speeches and various writings |year=1908|publisher=Nabu Press, Tip. Italo-Oriente. |location=París |isbn=1246238489 |oclc=1246238489}}

:* {{cite book |title=Tres discursos en los festejos del Centenario (1910)|trans-title=Three speeches in the centenary celebrations (1910)|year=1908|publisher=Nabu Press, Tip. Italo-oriente.|location=Bogota|isbn=1246238489|oclc=1246238489}}

:It seems that this would be a better citation for the first one:

:* {{cite book |last=Quijano Wallis |first=José María |display-authors=0 |title=Estudios, discursos y escritos varios |trans-title=Studies, speeches and various writings |publisher=R. Roger y F. Chernoviz |publication-place=Paris |year=1908 |oclc=903480537 |language=es |url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/hvd.32044082660226 |via=HathiTrust}}

:Peaceray (talk) 20:50, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::This would be the citation for that last one:

::*{{cite book |last=Quijano Wallis |first=José María |display-authors=0 |title=Tres discursos en los festejos del Centenario |trans-title=Three speeches at the Centennial celebrations |publisher=Imprenta de El Nuevo Tiempo |publication-place=Bogotá |date=1910 |url=https://repository.eafit.edu.co/items/98495ad8-a763-425c-951b-1267ab99b76c |language=es |access-date=2025-05-28 |oclc=891372472 |via=Universidad Eafit}}

::Peaceray (talk) 21:03, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Thanks. I think the references in "Selected works" are correct now. The article is still missing a source for the birth and death dates that agrees with the birth and death dates in the text. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 21:10, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Not just Donald Trump, but almost every article I try to click on?Astrocond (talk) 21:50, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{reply|Astrocond}} Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I know trying to edit a page and finding out you can’t can feel frustrating. Pages here are protected, or limited in who can edit the page, usually based on vandalism, other disruptive editing, or because it is recognized as a contentious topic. If there is a page you are interested in adding to that is protected, you can use the Edit Request Wizard, and this will add a request so that other editors who can edit the page can evaluate your request. cyberdog958^Talk 22:02, 28 May 2025 (UTC)