Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 13#Regional roads navboxen in Georgia

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:41, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|Diplomatic missions in Somalia}}

A navbox with only one link (WP:NAVBOX). AHeneen (talk) 20:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

• Delete Per nominator's rationale. Navboxes exist to provide an easy means for readers to navigate among links to related topics. One link doesn't cut it. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
• Support Please see: :Category:Foreign relations templates. --►Cekli829 11:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|College Home Run Derby champions}}

Not everything needs a navbox. This one only has one blue link, so there's nothing to navigate to or from. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - Four out of five primary links in this template are to non-existent articles, thus violating the fundamental principle of navboxes: they exist to facilitate reader navigation among existing Wikipedia articles. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:46, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
• Delete Dirtlawyer1's reasoning.--Yankees10 00:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - per those above. This may be worth a list if notable. Rlendog (talk) 13:36, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:43, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|Online Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor}}

As with the other four Online Film Critics Society Award navboxes; see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 February 24#Template:Online Film Critics Society Award for Best Actor. Alakzi (talk) 14:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - Per nominator's rationale and recent precedent regarding closely related templates. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|Ancient Roman monuments}}

Orphaned template. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - Unused. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:49, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
• Delete as above. Neutrality^talk 18:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|Anarchopedia}}

Orphaned template. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|Analytical chemistry journals}}

Orphaned template. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 March 21. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|Alpineskiing2010WOG}}

Orphaned template. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|Allahabad topics|type=merge}}

:{{Tfd links|Allahabad Topics|type=merge}}

Propose merging Template:Allahabad topics with Template:Allahabad Topics.

Same template but used in different places. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

• These are identical; just redirect the newest one to the other. Alakzi (talk) 14:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC) Template:Allahabad Topics is actually not used anywhere; delete it. Alakzi (talk) 14:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
• Redirect "Allahbad Topics" to "Allahbad topics" per Alakzi's comment above. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|Air Force installations in the Continental US}}

Orphaned template. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

• Comment - {{Ping|Ricky81682}} This template was apparently created to complement those templates for USAF installations in Europe and Asia as currently used in the List of United States Air Force installations article. While the use of a template format may not be the best way to create and use such images, this image, as an image file or otherwise, should be converted and added to the foregoing article. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:: Fine to substitute it to me. It's not being used there now so wherever it belongs. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

::: {{Ping|Ricky81682}} Ricky, I've inserted the template into the list article identified above as a temporary expedient and placeholder. The subject template is actually a composite of a couple dozen transclusions of Template:Location map, and someone who is more deft with wiki template coding than myself will have to handle the substitution into the article so that it is done properly. You have my "delete" vote contingent on that being accomplished before or after this TfD discussion is closed. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:36, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|Advertisment Conflict}}

Orphaned template. I don't think it's necessary. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|Adjectivals and demonyms for Philippine provinces}}

Orphaned template that is probably better as a page like List of adjectival and demonymic forms for countries and nations or something. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:41, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|Dark Gaia Studios}}

• Unused, redundant template JMHamo (talk) 02:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
• Not of much use.   Bfpage |leave a message  22:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:38, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|Athens, Georgia highways}}

:{{Tfd links|Augusta, Georgia highways}}

:{{Tfd links|Columbus, Georgia highways}}

:{{Tfd links|Macon, Georgia highways}}

:{{Tfd links|Savannah, Georgia highways}}

The purpose these templates currently serve is better served by categories. Using navboxes adds unneeded clutter. See precedents at WP:USRD/P#Other debates and a couple TfDs that have already closed for similar templates that served the Valdosta, Georgia, and Lubbock, Texas, regions, as well as a discussion about a similar group of templates in the state of Arkansas that uses these precedents. TCN7JM 01:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

• Delete per Valdosta precedent.  VC  01:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - Per previous discussions. Dough4872 01:19, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
• Keep: As 1., the originator of these templates, and 2., a concerned editor, I think these boxes have visual value to the casual reader. When the boxes are collapsed, they don't take up much room. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 01:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
• Delete per the above and past discussions. --Rschen7754 04:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
• Delete—per precedent. The categories in the article are already by county, and metro areas in the US are defined by county, so these duplicate the by-county transportation categories. Imzadi 1979 → 06:51, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
• Delete Per nomination rationale as well as recent precedents. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:36, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|2013 in Sports - May}}

Unused, redundant template JMHamo (talk) 00:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

• Support: Not needed even though I stated it

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:37, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CONCACAF Fourth Round Group A}}

Unused, redundant template JMHamo (talk) 00:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:37, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|2012–13 Pro 12 League Table}}

Unused, redundant template JMHamo (talk) 00:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.